Not disturb the proceedings. Appellants, permit holders and Department Respondents are given 7 minutes to present the case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with the parties must include the comments within the 7 or 3 minute periods. Members of public who are not affiliated have up to 3 minutes to address the board and no eare buttal. Time may be limited to 2 minutes if the agenda is long or if there are a large number of speakers. The rehearing requests the parties are given three minutes each with no eare buttal. Our legal assistant will give you a verbal warning 30 seconds before the time is up. Four votes are required to grant an appeal, modify a permit or other city determination or grant a rehearing request. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing, the board rules or hearing schedules, email board staff at board of appeals at sfgov. Org. Public participation is very important to the board and every effort has been made to replicate the inperson hearing proc
Not to build housing. I want places for my kids to be able to live. I want others to enjoy what i enjoy which is housing security. Thank you. [indiscernible]. Im here to speak in support of the lot. Im personally squared when i transfer i wont be able to come back home and start a family. This is a perfect opportunity for that. What better way to have the inaugural day than starting off on the west side. Im really excited for the project and hopefully you can support it as well. Im a neighbor in this area. I dont support the project only because i dont support the height of it. Its a complete mismatch with the neighborhood. I love that were adding more Affordable Housing to the neighborhood. I think we need to consider the height of it. Most housing is two stories, this is four stories. Its a complete mismatch. Im a resident of San Francisco in d8 and a renter. I strongly support this project. I think if you look at it replacing a gas station with environmentally Family Friendly housin
Welcome to the San Francisco remote hearing for thursday, july 30, 2020. Ill enter into the record the mayor declared a local state of emergency related to covid19. Furthermore the mayor and governor have issued orders making it possible to hold hearings remotely. April 3, 2020 the Planning Commission received orders to rehold remote hearing. Im requesting everyones patience. The platform not perfect and at times fail. If you are not speaking, mute your microphone and turn off your video camera. Do not hit controls that may affect other participants. To enable participation sfgov. Tv is broadcasting and streaming live and will receive Public Comment by calling the tollfree number across the bottom. Opportunities to speak during the Public Comment period are available by calling 18882733658 access code 3107452 speaking pound and pound again. If you are connected and would like to speak or submit your comment hit 1 and then 0 and you will have three minutes and will hear a chime when you
Hello, im an social architect at architect nation, inc, and second slide, please. And im a resident for the past ten years and while in sorry, can you hear me now. We can, but weve already allowed the project sponsor to go forward so youll have to wait until his presentation is done. Understood. Next slide. Were on the chronology of ep engagement slide. We held a preapplication meeting wit neighbors to discussion the proposed project and the dr requester, brian fabian attended and provided a letter outlining his primary concerns and we emailed him copies of the drawings and offered to sketch a photograph from his yard and on april 17th, we received three photos from mr. Fabian and following on the 25th, mr. Fabian, we sent mr. Fabian a handdrawn sketch for the location of the proposed addition and on december 16th, 2020 excuse me, on may 6th, 2019, mr. Fabian responded. We provided all letters to the Planning Department for review and on may 20th, 2020, we confirmed with David Winslow
U process, i believe that we also could have some discretion in how quickly we would process that perm mit permit removed. Im going to refer to the Zoning Administrator on this. the tenant issue is always chachallenging because obviously its allowing it out side the purview of the code. If its not legalized if it is required to be removed and theres an existing tenant that does become an enforcement situation if we have an unauthorized unpermitted unit that may have life safety deficiencies. We generally want that unit to be vacated. Aobviously theres challenges with an existing tenant. We want to be open to options there. We dont have an open ended option to allow residency in an unauthorized unit and it may be something that the City Attorney wants to speak to further in terms of this issue and conflicts between our codes and other City Ordinances relating to renting units and occupancy. commissioner johnson. one second. I thought i heard them asking what happens if we do approve thi