This program. This is an insult to the intelligence to anybody. We are using Nuclear Deterrence. Are you serious . Out forebody is trying fox or something. At four clockup in the morning. For clock in the th 4 00 in the morning. You dont make up something about nuclear war. To talk aboutant your credentials and how long you have been studying this issue . Guest ive been studying this issue for almost seven years now. It is incredibly important that we talk about this issue because if you ask Nuclear Deterrence that deterred war during the cold war and we were in much r, you want to adjust to new environments. The world is not getting any safer just because we wanted to be. Quite contrary. Im not saying we should go back to the cold war with putin. We should think seriously about how to maintain peace. Host michaela dodges with the is with the Heritage Foundation on the next washington kempe reviews president obamas trip last week. Talk on the Health Care Law extension. Sal russo talks
Better shape of a potential lawsuit and if you didnt do Something Like that. And i think having Something Like the framework, which isnt a prescriptive rulebook, but its a much more flexible document that is tailored to individual companies makes it a better vehicle to achieve that kind of protection than the something that is more prescriptive, set in stone, concrete and difficult to be adapted to individual circumstances. Let me ask a followup on that. The idea of the framework is that it meets you where you are. If you are at a certain level and you are looking at the various aspects of the framework that you are looking at doing. As a smaller business and justice seeking generically that lack the resources to really fund against the nationstate. Are they at least in the context of liability is there any kind of distinction to say ive done my best but i cant go toe to toe with the nationstate. I think the framework is a good vehicle for doing that. It is adaptive, its not onesizefit
So i want to emphasize the difference between election interference and influence, so we know the election infrastructure was secure from interference, i want to turn to the issue of foreign influence campaigns. In your view does adversary proceeding the false succession that it was fraudulent, and can you explain how domestic actors amplify foreign disinformation campaigns and how that undermines confidence in our democratic process . So i think what we saw, i believe october 22nd, we did see some iranian efforts. Ive talked about this before where there were some emails that popped up on that day claiming to be reportedly from at least the proud boys that were talking about specifically to democratic voters it said, you need to change your registration to vote for President Trump, if you dont, we will find you and take care of business, i guess. The issue is the ballot secrecy, so we identify that issue and isolates it and put up a rumor control debunker, and you know, in the meantim
Committee on health, education, labor and pensions, and the appropriations subcommittee on labor, health, human services, appropriations will come to order. In march of this year, Public Health officials reported an outbreak of ebola virus in guinea. Unlike past Ebola Outbreaks that it have been efficiently and effect if there stopped, this outbreak has spread in ways that are potentially catastrophic for the world. Due to the gravity of the situation, the danger poses not only to the affected region but also to our country, i have taken the unusual step of calling together this joint hearing of both the authorizing committee i chair and the appropriations subcommittee which funds it, which i also chair. We have come togetherred to to learn what can so we can Work Together over the coming weeks to stop this daysly plague. The extent of this epidemic is tragic and grows more serious with each passing day. The death toll is already far greater than all other previous Ebola Outbreaks comb
Classified hearings. That is adequate oversight . It is a joke. Have to make the point, which is is that the First Amendment, and also article 1, section 5, which says that each has to keep a journal of its proceedings, and from time to time publish the same, excepting such parts as it may this their judgment, require secrecy and the yays and anyways on either hays we always point out that even George Washington in that founding father realized there was an issue after secrecy and the issue of the First Amendment. And thats the tension of this debate. Sir . Institute for justice. My question is for mr. Yu tide the whole office come . My good colleague and i anybody else from the office with a question . Supporters of the ementire empire. Do they gate any questions . The constitution has a presumption of liberties that power that are enumerated and limited. Earlier you mentioned that courts shouldnt really wage are Political Capital on engaging on issues involve thing exercise of power