Page 335 - Detection News Today

Question about whether his security clearance should be pulled based on these potential developments. how would you answer some of the questions that malcolm brought up? >> well, malcolm is absolutely right that any other american official who made this kind of proposal to a foreign government to have a private line of communications that avoided u.s. government detection would have their security clearance not just yanked immediately, but likely would be subject to prosecution for espionage. so...

Intelligence officials tonight, current and former, who are flabbergasted by this story and are really calling it a game changer. this "washington post" story. because this is the first time weve seen what looks like an active effort to conceal russian contacts. this isnt just about forgetting about disclosing contacts on a security clearceorm. if true, if this report is true, the allegation is that there was an active effort by mr. kushner to avoid detection by the u.s. intelligence community. ...

Are really calling it a game changer. this "washington post" story. because this is the first time weve seen what looked like an active effort to conceal russian contacts. this isnt just about forgetting about disclosing contacts on a security clearance form. if true, if this report is true, the allegation is that there was an active effort by mr. kushner to avoid detection by the u.s. intelligence community. and one other thing that people are remarking about this story is that whoever leaked t...

Active effort apparently to avoid detection, to have a secret channel. and let me just, you know, offer some context for our viewers. i mean russia is an adversary of the united states, an espionage adversary. anyone around the intelligence community and around the fbi who had been advising the trump campaign knows that. and they know american officials have to be very careful about any contacts with the russians because the russians are constantly throwing people, trying to recruit americans, t...

>> jenna: what is the difference? >> support people and bomb maker and hiding place and operational cell would be other individuals like the bomber who perhaps are staging for attacks. and thats why the urgency is. there when you read between the lines of what the british are doing, that speaks to urgency. but again, the difficulty in the global environment, there is a lot of the places if someone is aware of how to avoid detection, they can you know, pull this all. you will never be able to sto...

Through security. you can go to so many places -- anywhere in america and there are crowds of people. there are just crowds of people. you cant make everything secure. but are there ways to protect against something like this? >> look, you are absolutely right, first and foremost. as awful as it is, they choose soft targets and soft targets tend to be exactly that. there are things filled with children, things that we would never think need this security. so yes, the good news is, yes, there are...

Why not? what is so special about getting inside? whether or not the device is large, you still will have a component of the consisted metal parts. thats going to set the metal detector off. what will happen is the detonation will occur at the security checkpoint, four, as he said, they wont even risk it. wont you let that several thousands his venue, theres no possibility of detection. the explosions are not detectable by docs and they just get into the crowd and get made. >> trace: we talk abo...

Lying. >> there are been too many times in the past that the republicans have gone out on a limb and defended him. this is very, very serious. >> nobody will defend the president on this. they may say its not true but if its true he will get no defense on this. >> in the world of counterterrorism, when a terrorist organization thinks that theres someone near them who may know something -- first of all, that person who is a human asset getting close to isis, that person is likely dead. im being b...

Russian foreign minister and ambassador. joining me now is ned price, former senior director of the national security council and michael mcfaul, former u.s. ambassador to russia. ned, i understand part of your work when you were at the cia was detection and disruption of possible terror attacks against the u.s. and its interests. if thats your history, how do you look at this tonight? >> this is the nightmare scenario. whether they be friends, ally, sometimes even adversaries share intelligence...

Julie: it takes many layers werent nypd. >> whether it many the counter terrorism pure owe, the bomb squad, the network of cameras. the explosive detection dogs other intelligence bureau, which is the investigations -- sources of information. julie: officers armed with long guns visible to the public protecting trump tower. the critical response teams have president trumps every step covered. layer two. if the not so visible counter sniper team. and we got an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at ...