Plotting an attack against the states, article two still gives the president the to conduct whatever is necessary to protect the united gives me causet to be confident that we arent theing the security of United States at risk and that we will be able to come back and decision. Dependent if isis poses a threat to the United States in another country as to whether its a good idea to bring to country as well, which may involve a completely different set of factors. For johnson. I think much of this discussion underscores my primary point is we should spend a lot of time on definition. Of time defining exactly who the enemy is. Name one group, defined. So if we spend a lot of time defining a lote enemy is and spend of time finding exactly what the and then be 100 committed to the objective, anybodys hand, dont ations. Imit is is if we do that it will be easier the partners that will also be 100 committed to the exact properly defined objective. Example, the first gulf war. When the first
Knowing whether they have been limited on what actions might or may not be available. The president has made it clear it is not his policy. I have never seen anybody more adamant about that and more clear in every statement he has made. They were all quoted. He has reiterated it. But that doesnt mean that you want to take away what might be conceivably necessary the president is absolutely clear about his policy. President s the decision to use force and thank you to this committee for voting and having made clear that congress was moving in that direction guess what . Instead of one or two days of bombing, in order to send a message that you shouldnt use these, we got a deal with russia to get 100 of the weapons out. That is because you didnt limited. Didnt limit it. That was another moment where for the first time in history during a conflict we removed all known declared chemical weapons from a country, and believe me thank god we did. Today, isolate is in their controlling half the
That morning, i knew what it was like to belong to an Intelligence Agency that had been ringing the bell for many months about the plans to attack. Thatf us were devastated al qaeda operatives were able to carry out such horrific attacks in simultaneous fashion. While i remit or walking the halls of cia that day to ensure as many agencies as possible had left the building. They work through that day and that night in the following days in the following nights to piece together the clues as to what plans are underway to carry out more attacks. Their cia brothers and sisters who were dispersed around the globe many in dangerous environments to the same thing only 15 days after 9 11 under it was cia who put the First American boots on the ground in afghanistan. Less than two months after arriving the United States suffered its First Casualty what a 32yearold cia officer was killed in action november 25. Ciae his death, 20 other officers have lost their lives around the world the events of
Does the standin Prime Minister agree with the Prime Minister . Because they were his words. There are some important controls that we need to improve and strengthen. It is essential that we reintroduce the proper border controls and exit checks that were removed by previous governments. I insisted that that was in the coalition agreement. We are now on track to do that, so, just as we count people in, we count them out as well. Those additional controls are important, because we can then discover who has overstayed their visa here in the united kingdom, which is one of the biggest problems that we face. You have been watching Prime Ministers questions from the house of commons. Question time airs live every wednesday at 7 00 eastern and medical eastern and pacific on cspan. Watch anytime at cspan. Org, where you can find video of past Prime Ministers questions and other Public Affairs programs. Monday night on the communicators, mary gray on the ethics of Internet Companies harvesting
Down. They have been overfunded 10 years ago, maybe underfunded today, but may become overfunded again. That is why when you are looking at it, youre looking at it as a longterm rate. So having some underfunding in is not a lar year problem, it is just what is going on overtime. So, you know, there was a law passed in 2006 that tries to put in more s to money into pension plans. They say that if they put in more money, then that takes away from some of their profits, and other things they could be doing. And there is a balancing act between putting in enough money and putting in too much money. So that is what washington is dealing with. Host we appreciate you coming on. Guest thank you so much. Host coming up next, the of the attorney general a new states, he has book a conservative and compassionate approach to Immigration Reform. Well be talking about that. Here are some of the programs you will find this weekend on the cspan networks. Evening at 8 00 pm, political reporters share s