Warshell. Ill close out comments. Obviously thank you all for coming out and having a meaningful conversation about a topic that kind of haunts our Building Community for many, many years. So i mr. Duffy, you wanted to Say Something . Just before you finish, joe duffy d. B. I. Mr. Butler referred to me on a building permit. I want to say it was temporary shoring of a building. Those do not go to the Planning Department. We need to approve them, when it comes to someone on the third floor, were doing the process and refer to engineers for approval. So the permit hes referencing that i was so wrong on, i was actually right on. A temporary shoring permit. I wanted to correct on that item. Thank you mr. Duffy. I do get it, theres a lot of permits out there. I think in the spirit of the conversation, its hard to monitor and track, but thank you for clarifying that. And just one other thing the misrepresentation on plans is as big of a problem as demolition. I dont know if youre getting all
Stanoff on ambulance on time. Can you go into a little detail on that. It looks fantastic but just to make sure im reading these right. The first page, the first tab the first ambulance on the scene. Could you go into detail on the numbers. They look pretty good but am i reading it right . You are. 90 all the time. Starting with the first unit on scene, commissioner veronese brought up, the qrvs would help that one. Thats when we get our first unit there to the code three responses. The 90th percentage 5. 18. What they want us to be 4. 50. That would be the goal. Thats why i say the qrvs would help there. Thats where we get the most calls, theyd get there quick. I think it would bring it closer to 4. 5. The second section, the first als unit on scene, including the engines or ambulances or rescue captain. Were mandated to get them 90th percentage under 7 minutes and were at basically 6. 326. Emergency response, the last one is the first ambulance on scene the goal there, 90th percentag
The first ambulance on the scene. Could you go into detail on the numbers. They look pretty good but am i reading it right . You are. 90 all the time. Starting with the first unit on scene, commissioner veronese brought up, the qrvs would help that one. Thats when we get our first unit there to the code three responses. The 90th percentage 5. 18. What they want us to be 4. 50. That would be the goal. Thats why i say the qrvs would help there. Thats where we get the most calls, theyd get there quick. I think it would bring it closer to 4. 5. The second section, the first als unit on scene, including the engines or ambulances or rescue captain. Were mandated to get them 90th percentage under 7 minutes and were at basically 6. 326. Emergency response, the last one is the first ambulance on scene the goal there, 90th percentage were not meeting it this month, it could have to do with new years eve but usually around nine minutes, the 90th percentage. Were doing good on that stat. Thank you
Up with what is the percentage decline in the rent. Once we have the percentage decline in the rent, we multiply that to the total rent value, what we estimate, given the data, vendor which we used there to look at all the parcels around the city. And figure out what is the total what was the assumed per Square Footage for Residential Office retail and p. D. R. . I believe about, total citywide was i believe 107 million, office space not how many square foot, what did you value it per square foot for rent. Yeah, rent is, i believe, if my memory serves me right, about 67, 63 to 64 for the office space per square feet, and if i believe its for retail, about 30. And for p. D. R. , around 10. So, i can get you those numbers exact, thats the range we are talking about. And what was the assumed value for the market rate residential . Market rate, using an average of these based on the 700, average 749 square foot area, 800,000 per unit market unit. 800,000 rent, total across the city and the
20 . Under this d. D. A. , its 18 . But the developer does get more participation in project revenues and that is on page 19 of the report. In terms of sort of the project financing, Public Financing for the horizontal infrastructure, the developer under the d. D. A. Will construct the infrastructure. Funding sources are shown on page 14 of our report. The sources and uses are estimated to be about 700 million, thats in current dollar value. The developers and the project source, project revenue financing this project have shown the table on page 14. The Developers Equity contribution is estimated to be about 190 million. They have already contributed about 27 million of that towards entitlement costs. With their return, we estimate that the return to developer and the payment to developer will be around 268 million in current dollars. Under the d. D. A. , the developer is paid back from project revenues, prepaid ground leases, rents, financing from the financing district, they say the