Several capacities, i wish principals like you could stay forever. The environment that you create for our young people, the environment that you create for our teachers and the environment you create with the school as a part of community is something that is very special and so, of course, youre going to be missed by the district. Youll be missed by the students at mission, but i just want to thank you for your service and i want to thank you for being able to work so closely with community and develop young people to send so many young people to our uc schools. That is a major, major accomplishment and i want to thank you for setting up the environment for learning an enrichment so our students can be successful in that endeavor. Supervisor hainey. Thank you. Er irritatioric, you know we alo much respect. I came and spent a lot of time with you and watched you in action and being a principal in a high school is one of the toughest jobs there could be. But you made it look easy. I me
He said do you want to be principal and i said heck, no and you could put another word if for heck and i couldnt imagine taking mr. Truetts place and being there. Hes done such a fabulous job. And i said, if you say i have to do it, i have to do and its been the greatest honor of my life for certain. I have to thank all of the teachers, the faculty and you asked about the new shoes. So miss mccambey has taken over and shes been there many, many years and mission is in great hand. The antiracist teaching work, the social justice work will continue, will only deepen and get stronger and i couldnt be prouder of that. I also just have to say personally, as a child, my grandmother went to girls high school, which is the First High School for young women in San Francisco. My father, he went to sherman and marina and lowell and he went to schools in the city, as well. I was born in the city and it has been such an honor for me to be there and to be ail to d ablo the antiracist work but i do i
Joined me as we cut the ribbon with mayor breed, but essentially designed to work with wonderful programs like Young Community developers and the lead agency out there in the intercity youth to attach and refer people to the opportunities, many of those actually in the Construction Industry and we have many of our brother exposbrothers and sistee carpenters unions and they have been a phenomenal partner in putting people to work in an industry and giving many people their first opportunity for longterm employment. So today after that, last year, many of you supported our citygrow program, which was designed to help expand apprenticeship into a new industry in the cannabis industry. And we authored that with the support of the unanimous support of this board as a way to work with preapprenticeship pathways to state. Approved apprenticeshp program and iowu workers and so we now are looking forward to working with employers and getting graduates of this apprenticeship connected. Bases on
I think it lines up with the 10 change of other jurisdictions and realizing this was the threshold. We werent sure why it was set the way it was back in 2003. We didnt see a strong justification for that at the time. What was the justification in new york city for 10 . I guess it was they had a substantial white paper done by nyu on the number of individuals that were associated with contractors and business entities in the city that were giving and they had given around 25 of all contributions. We have not been able to do the same analysis that was done by a university working with the Campaign Finance board to complete that. But it seemed to given the sort of similar circumstances between the two cities seemed to be well reasoned. Is that the same argument for why the threshold for the dollar amount in the contract was raised from 50 to 100 . We were able to break that down in our analysis based on the reports we had seen and it appeared to us that the 50,000 threshold was capturing
Otherwise, the discloser would have to change to the individual making the contribution. The committee would be in a better place to report it to us. Are committees liable if donors are not forth coming and fail to inform the committee out of neglect . I think thats i dont think that was the intention of the commission but a policy directive for them to determine. Theres administrative opposed to civil criminal agency, we look at strict liability and dont try to understand the intent. But we look at all the factors for enforcement action and what severity. Page 10 line 9, why is the ownership interest threshold lowered from 20 to 10 . Is there data that supports that change . I think its consistent with the ideas from other jurisdictions, particularly new york citys ban where this was extracted or amended from. I think it lines up with the 10 change of other jurisdictions and realizing this was the threshold. We werent sure why it was set the way it was back in 2003. We didnt see a str