Page 120 - Development Agreement News Today

Bedrooms awe piece and those number 2 the appellant does not meet the criteria for dont guess it must be considered but up to you how to weigh them and the commission felt in this case, the project meets 13 of 17 criteria and therefore they may be finding in their approval the net gain of 18 bedrooms and that the scale of the project is consistent with the neighborhood there would be no Significant Impact to either of the streets or muni and to replace those building would be consistent with the...

Impact thirty or 40 percent we need to get that number up higher i dont know how but as a policy getting 60 or 70 we try to leverage it but were trying to patch the money to mitigate the impacts but i mean its we have more of a shared responsibility especially from the upside of the vendors maybe to the Mayors Office as well to figure out how to do that the other one we also hear that projects dont pan out id like to have a developer and trust you come up and show me lets talk about the profit a...

Joined by courtney, the transbay assistant project manager. Good afternoon. Im elizabeth, Development Specialist and im here with those two requests today. I did want to mention that in the rezs theres a change. Now back to the project. The project will be an affordable 85 unit family project and will include a child care facility and open space. This project is part of a larger master Block Development in the transbay redevelopment area. The transbay redevelopment project area was adopted in 20...

Seems pretty straightforward. I just want to know what is the difference between previous policy and now . Do you know . Im sorry, could you repeat that . Yeah, i said what is the difference between the previous policy and this policy . What are the changes . Well, basically that was the list i recited, those are all changes. Some are minor, but fund emptily weve changed it to accommodate dissolution law, first of all. Previous policy did not mention cfd issuance so weve included that because cf...

Weve had massive shifts in demand between counties and no one no where in the places ive seen is the Planning Department facing how much demand is being shifted into San Francisco pride housing for people working on the peninsula down to Santa Clara County being bused up here and displaced uses between residents because of people being bused are well paid men in their 20s and 30s and the people being displaced especially in the mission and south of market tend to be low income and middleincome p...

Quickly and it is also complicated we dont want to be subsidizing otherwise affluent peopleing in the sites we want to serve people in buildings that are below 80 percent of area medium income that restricts our sites theres a lot of moving parts and it is going slower than we like but we want to develop a program to make it an effective program. Thank you commissioner richards. Thank you very much im actually, the benefit of this presentation yesterday with commissioner johnson so weve received...

The alleged traffic which is significant it is too close to the sidewalk outside of our business and the basement deliver doors we require those delivery doors to operated our business we get our liquor and dry goods and you name it without those were done im concerned about this impact were at the mercy of the deliveries they could show up at 8 00 a. M. And it that backs up on fifth street what are were going to do were looking at 2 hundred and 80 trucks and vehicles this is only a stone throug...

The general platoon there is a growing need for larger units as extended families increase and more households stay in the city the appellant is correct so four units is correct its not uncommon because there are so many other requirements and rear yard that apply so although the property is less than the maximize density the property will be closer in k3406r789 with the density of the area so in conclusion so the following reason the Department Recommends that you uphold the decision to grant t...

Thank you, amy, and good afternoon, president katz, fellow commissioner. My name is phil williamson, senior project manager of the Port Development group. Here this afternoon before you with an e a amendment which i will in a little bit of detail and will be available afterwards to answer questions for you along with other members of our project team. Since executing a twophase exclusive negotiation agreement in september of 2010 for the development of seawall lot 337, also known as parking lot ...

7 pursuant to the California Environmental quality act. And item 5h, approving a revision to the transbay block 7 Schematic Design package originally approved by the commission on april 16, 2013, to reorganize some of the ground floor uses to create building efficiencies and increase from 77 to 85 units and making environmental findings pursuant to the California Environmental quality act, trab redevelopment project area, discussion and action, resolution number 712014. Madam director. Thank you...