Welcome to inside story. Im ray suarez. 15 years ago, a conference of the worlds nations agreed to the Millennium Development goals. The ambitious set of targets were meant to lift the worlds poore poorest eradicating poverty, and many more things. It was time limited and came to a close this year. The world did well. Around the world the way health and poverty are conventionally measured show improvement. Ambitious. Reporter back in 2000 the former u. N. Secretary general came up with the plan, the Millennium Development goals consisted of eight targets. The mdgs would run for 15 years. That time is now up. So was it a success . Well, its mixed. One target was to half the proportion of People Living on less than a dollar a day. That was met in 2010. The other goal, reduce the Maternal Mortality ratio, that number did not go down at all. Theres a whole new set of complex and Ambitious Goals called the sustainable Development Goals. Theyll be called the global goals. There are many pres
Late husband, argentina is choosing a new president. And im live at the stadium where australia has booked their place in the final of the rugby world cup, but pakistan takes control against england into the final days of the second test in dubai. Right now and for the next few hours at least leaders from across europe are trying to find out if they can get a unified response to the refugee crisis facing the continent. Almost 700,000 people have arrived in europe so far this year, many coming from syria. The pressure is now on to find a lasting solution before winter. The summit meeting in brussels brings together leaders from these countries who are on the front line of the crisis. So far these nations have failed to come to any common agreement on what to do. Al jazeera has seen a draft statement which includes measures such as not allowing nations to wave through refugees unless the country to which they are heading agrees. The draft statement says that the eu will send out more Bor
Decades and its not something that we are unfamiliar with in this country. I think that its important to distinguish the regulation as it is written and has practiced there was a piece in the times a couple of weeks ago, and this was written by an Expert Health professionals would tell him know i cant tell you that it is, the mother wasnt at all. It wasnt at all. Its just a lot easier to say no with some recognition as an excuse. I have the question about Data Security. The only way to get to a Data Security is multibilliondollar a year over your investments of policies practices procedures and technology. I know of the Data Security is a regulatory issue in marketing issue but we will speak to the regulatory issue. Is that a breach of vacation a begin of incentive to force companies to invest in Data Security . Every dollar you put into Data Security you take it from research and development so where is the approach that government cant take for companies to invest to make sure we hav
Moment. Let me refrain the question. Is it ever permissible to go to a hair salon or your personal gym unrelated to that exemption for you or your family or to purchase gift cards in using a governmentissued debit card, purchase card, credit card . Not unless it has a government associated use, an approved use. And are the policies you look at epa explicit about that prohibition . They are not explicit about the prohibition. They are not . Right, that was part of our recommendation in the report is that they be more explicit about the issues of gym memberships and gift cards, that they need to improve controls there. Epa is in the process of improving their policies in that area, but they have not completed their policies in that area. That doesnt sound complicated. What goes through one ones mind if you have a federally issued credit card and decide i need groceries tonight. Why not just put it on the government card . Im not saying anyone has ever done that, but clearly some alarm be