Just reiterate that you know, rh 2, this comes right from our planning code, which includes these statements, these statements are devoted to one family and two Family Housing with two large flats one occupied by the owner and the other one for rental. This proposal does not match whats defined in the rh 2 class use of rh 2. There are plenty of options to meet this. And refocusing back on the property we lost, this was a property next to the museum and you can see this is what our property will look like, this will be 22 ord, 24 ord, this will be the top on state street and the other side of state street. Its going to be sloping up the hill, im sure there are dimensional differences and this is a preview of what we can look forward to. This is the plot plan again from the project sponsor. I just wanted to point out what that means for a little bit of yard in the middle. You can see this is concrete wood and concrete and the open space in the middle of the rear yard is not much of green
Second already. Are there any corrections to the minutes . I had a question. Sure. On the request for follow up from Human Resources about progress on streamlining and making more effective hiring which seems to be a drag on progress in many of the departments in terms of meeting their objectives. When can we get that update . I believe the hr director will speak to you. Director. Good afternoon. We have a event in the last week of august and mapping it out and making improvements and i believe i asked to come back in september to give an update and i will check with mark to make sure im on the agenda. Perfect. Thank you. Youre welcome. Okay. Any other comments or questions on the corrections . If not all in favor say aye. The minutes are approved. Next item please. The next item is the directors report. Good afternoon. I am sitting in for director garcia who is on a well deserved vacation in hawaii right now and the first is the launch of the San Francisco health network, the sign is
Going to add value to our nonprofit organizations as he regarding to those and this is not the right way to go about it supervisor wiener thank you, mr. President. So i have supported some supplementals and others not support them case by case were appreciable for things to go through the normal budget process but sometimes things arises in the middle of the year whether an unaccepted federal budget cut or or time sensitive situation we cant wait so its a case by case. In terms of that specific item im not expressing on opinion whether its a good or bad thing ive supported the business in the past i know we have a lot of nonprofits when and workers in the nonprofits that could benefit from a cost of doing business adjustment our nonprofit partners in an absolutely essential part of the work and the services we provide and help provide as a city. With that said, what does make me uncomfortable about the resolution it is lesbian the nicaragua substance whether to the some point in this y
Are options. Developers i believe contractors are very skilled in that kind of thing. The nileance of this variance, the ability to construct units on the property would remain available as other projects on the class of district. Again i wanted to show the alternative envelope that the project sponsor proposed and i have to reiterate that this averaging rear zone does not apply to this property. It goes further back than it should. You see there are a lot of opportunities that has additional housing for folks here in the community. And i didnt really focus on this one, but i wanted to just reiterate that you know, rh 2, this comes right from our planning code, which includes these statements, these statements are devoted to one family and two Family Housing with two large flats one occupied by the owner and the other one for rental. This proposal does not match whats defined in the rh 2 class use of rh 2. There are plenty of options to meet this. And refocusing back on the property we
Construct units on the property would remain available as other projects on the class of district. Again i wanted to show the alternative envelope that the project sponsor proposed and i have to reiterate that this averaging rear zone does not apply to this property. It goes further back than it should. You see there are a lot of opportunities that has additional housing for folks here in the community. And i didnt really focus on this one, but i wanted to just reiterate that you know, rh 2, this comes right from our planning code, which includes these statements, these statements are devoted to one family and two Family Housing with two large flats one occupied by the owner and the other one for rental. This proposal does not match whats defined in the rh 2 class use of rh 2. There are plenty of options to meet this. And refocusing back on the property we lost, this was a property next to the museum and you can see this is what our property will look like, this will be 22 ord, 24 ord,