San francisco to this day do not opative smoke alarms in their units and the lack of working smoke alarm is a major cause of death from fire. We are this law requiring loaners to provide nrfgz in english, spanish, chinese to renters every year on the importance of smoke alarms and their responsibility they as pauperty owners have. The second problem the law addresses is many biltdings dont have opative fire alarms in common areas. This means that in the case of a fire tenants often times are not aware that a fire is actually taking place and we heard this from a number of the people who survive some of the fires that they didnt hear the alarm so this law requires there is proper inspection and testing of fire alarms in these buildsings and also requires department of building inspection maintain a website where tenant can look up for themselves to find out whether or not the building where they live is in compliance mpt the third piece of this legislation addresses the fact many buildi
Westthe carerize coming east and turn quickly on to second street. We have had several serious accidents, one of somebody that is down my hall who was bumped by a car and thousand up in the air, came down on her back and she is seriously injured. This is a area where sometimes it is not too bad, but many times the people that are going on this entrance in the Late Afternoon to evening and the giants games are worse, this is a very very dairns and confusing situation mpt there are nolet me just finish. There are no traffic parole people there. Im just concerned because when i project like this goes through without anyone in planning looking at what it may mean to the the people that live there, i think you are forgetting the taxpayers in the mix and the safety of your residence. Thank you. Thank you very much. Any other member thofz public who would like to provide Public Comment in support of the appellate . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And now well move on to presentation fr
3 it isnt in the documents. You never looked at the cumulative impact of all indevelopment on the neighborhood. So, you logically when you look at this from a case by case perspective conclude there is no unusual circumstances or cumulative impact. I think this project would really benefit from a little more process. A deeper understandic of what is happening to our neighborhood. I think that the interim measures are substantial evidence of unusual circumstances. I also want to remark a condo across from us just sold 3 million dollars. A condo the same size proposed by the project sponsors. If a 3 million condo will give relief for middle class flight than we live in a much more proper city i thought we did. I also want to say exercising my right doesntant make me hostile and hat is how we are painted here today. Because we exercise our procedural rights are hostile. I have no problem with within of any character becomes my neighbor so im very disappointed those allegations are made he
Includes sign jtsage and roof deck. In the cpe the Department Found the project would be consistent with the Development Density established by the east Soma Community plan and not result in any significant Environmental Impacts beyond those aurmtd identified in the eastern neighborhood rezooning and area plans final Impact Report could you speak close toor the microphone jss in such situations the guidelines a cpe is warranted ask no Environmental Review is required. We believe the cpe is prepared thmpt matter for the board is whether to uphold the departments decision and deny the appeal or overturn the departments decision and return the project to the department for additional review. We sent a package [inaudible] i should also note thatarve submitting our writtenen response we received emails from 3 neighbors that echoed the concerns raise. With regards to the concern about Pedestrian Access tothe site. Pedestrian exists from side walks and unmarked cross walks adjoining the exist