Some of the fossil fuel areas. And ill suggest an area that my republican colleagues on the energy and Commerce Committee criticized during a Committee Meeting not too long ago and that was the Carbon Capture and sequestration. Compare the return on investment right now provided in this bill for the multimilliondollar amount were putting into Carbon Capture that has not proven that is not proven compared to what we could achieve on a return and investment in Energy Efficiency for our neighbors, for our businesses and for jobs. So therefore this amendment will shift a little bit, not all, from those technologies and put it into a place where it works, Energy Efficiency. I appreciate Ranking Member kapturs vision. She understands that this is our future, this is a job creator. I appreciate her work and chairman simpsons work on the appropriations bill. I ask for an ray vote on the cass an aye vote on the castor amendment and i yield back the balance of my time. The chair the gentlelady y
We do not need to worry about that because they can get across borders and go by land. That number might be reduced to five or 10 a day . I cannot comment on what numbers. If someone had to make an effort rather than going on airport and jumping on a plane, if they really had to, dont you think the number would dramatically dropped . I know people come back. Right now we are able to screen them and collect information. What if they do not come back . A lot of people miss country, they do not come back. What happens then . If you have five coming in today, i were my constituents rather have five a day coming in. This thing of checking for temperatures, like it will help, is like scrubbing what does not need to be scrubbed. I would like to commend reading this copy, ebola is coming to america. The u. S. Had a chance to stop the virus in its tracks, but it missed. The issue came out before mr. Duncan came to this country and before he was diagnosed with ebola. There is good reading in the
Climategate, and they are talking about falsifying information to make the public believe this is happening. The u. K. Telegraph said it is the worst scientific scandal of our generation. Thats pretty serious stuff there, i say to my friend in the stuff. The worst scientific scandal of our generation. Clive cook, thats the financial times, the closed mindedness of these supposed men of science is surprising even to me. The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering. Thats from the financial times. Were all familiar with that publication here. A prominent ipcc physicist said climategate was a fraud on a scale ive never seen. A u. N. Scientist dr. Phillip lloyd said the result is not scientific. Newsweek said once celebrated climate researchers feel like used car salesmen. None of the ipccs most quoted data and recommendations were taken straight out of the unchecked activist brochures. Thats newsweek magazine. George mornboith he said quote it is no use pretending that this isnt a
For the discussion. Everyone was positive in general about the progress made at nato. And some of the challenges we face externally. But, of course, some of the challenges internal to the alliance were not discussed as much. And i thought, perhaps, bob can put you on the spot a bit and talk about one of those which is in turkey, was a surprise that the turkish government decided to open negotiations with a chinese firm to provide missile capabilities. Could you comment on where you see that going, whats the latest status is and the u. S. Government perspective is on that. Well, the u. S. Government perspective is quite clear and that is our good allies, the turks, should acquire a system thats nato and operable. If that were true before ukraine, i think its true in space given the ukraine. So heres a case where the turkish government had a set of metrics to influence a cooperation, a competition. And somehow nato operatability wasnt on that list. And i have a feeling that even the capa
If we sacrifice the future, do we really take care of all the past cleanup . We hardly do whats necessary, even with current funding. And so i think its a perfect example of where the sequestration process is so counterproductive and moves america backwards. We have very imperfect choices here, and actually very dangerous choices that we are being forced to make. I think the majority would be much better suited to come back to us with a budget that allows us to do the job that the energy and water subcommittee is charged with doing. We simply cant try to solve the problem internal through the resources weve been given. Its an impossibility, and so somebodys going to be going to lose. Im sure those that came up washington. Ies in the people who are getting water assistance, they just lost money. They got no lobby here. They got none of those people from the various Nuclear Sites to come in here and lobby for them, and yet they just lost out in a prior amendment. They have a right to an