To give to sell the news. And i think this is because we are genetically predispose today pay more attention to bad things. Bad is stronger than good because bad things could be a threat to survival. Our hunters, forefathers who were more worried, who didnt relax, who looked anxiously toward the horizon whether there might be predators, they probably survived more often than others. They passed on genes to us and stress hormones and attention to all the bad things that could go on in the world. Add to this another factor, the fact that we are by nature nostalgic. We tend to think that the good old days were in another era, previous era in our childhood or even before this or even before that. These are some scenes from a brilliant french movie in 1959 about a man who goes back in time to a better era, the goldold days, where everything was wonderful. But then hes there and he thinks its pretty good but then he meets an old man who tells him, oh, you should have been there when i was yo
If we over turned the appeal what would your process be. Im sorry to uphold the appeal. Overturn the, sir certification all correct. We would act according to whatever the finding the board of supervisors made as to the specific deficiency the eir and take whatever steps would be necessary to bring the Internal Revenue back through certification and bring the project approvals back for reconsideration okay im going to more often and talk about the Economic Feasibility one of the things weve heard consistently this evening and in many neighborhoods merging and id like for you to discuss the Planning Department roll in reviewing the Economic Feasibility analysis provided by the consultant firm. This is the analysis on the alternatives that are analyzed. Thank you so ill start in responding this Economic Feasibility analysis was prepared by the project sponsor not at the behest of the Planning Department the feasibility was not the basis for decisions about the approvals of project or any
Heard the person believes that of flaltd and because it used the present land value instead of the lands use is there any legal stand. Doorstop mirena burns through the president i think i want to address one point and more directly the pot about the land value the first point i want to address is that the alternatives feasibility studies way part of the Planning Commission Decision Making around approving the project the ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the re
Ceqa findings that are discussed were the ceqa approval for the project not the certification finding what is before this board a certification of the eir not the project approval so there is two different slightly different standards for looking at alternatives depend on where youre looking an analysis versus a reservation to a project for the process of approving the project. Maybe i can rephrase are you able to talk about the ceqa appeal before the board and whether or not you doing the presents land value is the appropriate standard. The board is looking at the reasonable range of feasible alternatives to the projects under consideration like the project approval Decision Maker was the Planning Commission had enough options to look at it and the eir actually did not reject any of the four alternatives discussed as the 3 alternatives discussed rather as imagine feasible it looks like at the potential feasible this metal shed alternative the presentation the reduced density and the n
Commissioner marshall, commissioner dejesus, commissioner mazzucco, commissioner hwang, commissioner melara. Ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the wednesday september 21, 2016, Police Commission meeting. As sergeant has just informed us president loftus is not here this evening. Lets go to item 1. Clerk item 1 question of the chief of police to accept donation of a 2009 traverse from San Jose Police department to be used by the sfpd internet crimes against children valid at approximately 6386. Request of lieutenant rene pagano. We have item 1 which is a donation of a Chevrolet Traverse and the other item 4 coffee mugs to be used in the coffee room. Any questions . Public comment on the consent calendar, please. Public speaker this is one of the major issues that is going back for the Police Academy for nonpayment to protect children and environment because of a report as interfering with all these and carried out professionally which they always have different ideas. Some of these ideas