To be suspicious. We also learned someone was injured in that fire. A man suffered burns to his legs and a firefighter was also evaluated for heatrelated symptoms. The fire started yesterday afternoon and flames spread to a garage and property next door. Firefighters say the mobile home along with vehicles, boats and other items were badly damaged. Today marks the fifth anniversary of the napa earthquake that rocked wine country. The powerful 6. 0 quake hit at about 3 20 in the morning and was the largest to strike the bay area since the loma prieta quake in 1989. One person was killed and about 200 others injured. The most visible damage was downtown napa. Ed the historic crt th postal station however still needs to be fixed and some roads are just now getting cracks repaired. Meantime, they are preparing for another disaster this weekend in the north bay wildfires. Sonoma county held its first fullscale evacuation drill this morning. Neighbors in santa rosa who signed up for an alert
Treaties tore it up on the floor of the threat of another Nuclear Arms Race knocking up the door of think its time to start watching the whole. World the way you treat the. Real that this would. Be the plot of. The day like you said i got. This we. Would. Love the watching the harks i am tired of it and on top of the wallace. Bit of the i. N. F. Treaty for a while right as you mentioned the like not yesterday to maybe several of the week 98 is that like 30 or so my years ago we the United States said were not going to do this were going to abide by these treaties and as i understand that the reason we came out of the treaty is because russia wasnt following the treaty. Its amazing how we were able to build you know design test all the successful rocket that was outside of the i not treaty and trust a couple of weeks we are really good i mean thats a quick turnaround my point being that the i. M. F. Treaty that we were signing on to the United States is find out that its banned exactly
Fully aware of this. Making a last offer here without talking to united to save the mission does not show respect for the community. I dont think it shows respect for the commission that sent us back to Work Together and talk. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi there. I am john jensen. A citizen of San Francisco and i support projects like this. I just want to be on the record that i support this project. Thank you. Thank you. Any other Public Comment on this item . Public comment is now closed. Mr. Kaplan, question. How long have you been out this at this entitlement . I believe this project has been on file since 2015. How long has active entitlement process been . For years now. Thank you. Any other comments, commissioners . Ill bring up the same thing about a plus time to vote for approval of the project. Commissioner richards. I opened this hearing and Commission Comment saying i dont want to see us under any illusion that we are approving a Housing Project to have a g
If we move ahead to do anything with this project i would require that we condition it to have my affirmative vote, that we limit the amount of Corporate Housing rental that could be on the project to some reasonable level. What is a reasonable level . 10 . Why not zero . Zero. Okay. Would that maker of the motion except that accept that . Before i second its, another question i have of the project sponsor. He put an offer on the table, i dont want to get into private agreements, they cant accept it due to their process. If we approve it does the offer just to stay there . Can you just let them have it . Let me say this. The offer through yesterday was still on the table, which was the same offer the group had accepted previously. Should the commission approve this project today, there is a 30 day appeal time frame, i want to give anyway tricks of the trades. Theres another appeals in which we would be happy to not have to go through. There is more opportunities for this deal to still
Housing project to have a good portion of this project appear to be corporate rental like we talked at 2200 Market Street. If we move ahead to do anything with this project i would require that we condition it to have my affirmative vote, that we limit the amount of Corporate Housing rental that could be on the project to some reasonable level. What is a reasonable level . 10 . Why not zero . Zero. Okay. Would that maker of the motion except that accept that . Before i second its, another question i have of the project sponsor. He put an offer on the table, i dont want to get into private agreements, they cant accept it due to their process. If we approve it does the offer just to stay there . Can you just let them have it . Let me say this. The offer through yesterday was still on the table, which was the same offer the group had accepted previously. Should the commission approve this project today, there is a 30 day appeal time frame, i want to give anyway tricks of the trades. There