When will continue watching R T International with me becky aaron now our top story this hour doctors from around the world have condemned the British Governments handling of the Julian Assange case they claim the wiki leaks founder is being subjected to psychological torture in prison more than 100. 00 doctors have signed a joint letter urging the u. K. Authorities to take action they also called on the Australian Government to intervene to protect its citizen is the 4th doctors letter since the songs were made his 1st Court Appearance and documented a history of denial of access to health care and prolonged psychological torture it requested that the songs be transferred from beaumont prison to University Teaching hospital for medical assessment and treatment faced with evidence of untreated im only going to watch it also raises the question is dishonest fitness to participate in the u. S. Extradition proceedings. Next to make us face is a herring on his possible extradition to the u
I will welcome you watching r. T. International with me making arun. Doctors from around the world have condemned the British Governments handling of the julian i songs case they claim the wiki leaks founder is being subjected to psychological torture in prison more than 100. 00 doctors have signed a joint letter urging the u. K. Authorities to take action they also called on the Australian Government to intervene to protect its citizens is the 4th doctors letter since the songs made his 1st Court Appearance and documented a history of denial of access to health care and prolonged psychological torture it requested that the songs be transferred from beaumont prison to University Teaching hospital for medical assessment and treatment faced with evidence of untreated im only going to or should we also raise the question is dishonest fitness to participate in us extradition proceedings. Next week a staunch faces a hearing on his possible extradition to the us where hes been charged with h
Out there, we will actually issue an inspection notice. The project would have to go back to planning, and that changes the democounts, and thats a process that we have in place for those types of projects. Were trying to get away from people saying oh, it was rotten. We just took it down and ask for forgiveness. Were actually calling people ahead of time and making sure they dont get into that situation. This sounds like they may, based on some of the comments that ive heard tonight with framing and touch with soil and contact with wood, thats never a good thing. So with that, id say its a good enough permit, as long as they go down the line and follow the process. Commissioner honda so joe, is there no excavation here . I dont know, to be honest. I didnt see the drawings, and commissioner honda and im satisfied that because theyve gone through the process here that the Building Department will follow through because we realize how important it is, especially when youre doing retainin
Is the best way for the port to consider. And they should show us the nuance and gray areas but we will look at that. But i dont think were going to have a big philosophical discussion of maritime versus other but it will be nuances. I would hope that. But when i look at the criteria i dont see anything that ponies to maritime. Points to maritime. So all evaluation criteria will get points. The reality is they may impute it. But it is not a requirement from the pointing perspective. On page 12 of the staff report, we outline the scoring criteria with more detail than we saw on the slides. And if you look at 1b and 1e under quality of Design Development submittal, 1b talks about Performance Trust objectives which includes maritime and 1e calls out this balance that commissioner makras is pointing out. I agree it doesnt talk about how they are weighted but maritime is called out. So how many people are going to be on the panel. At least four. And its in the waterfront plan or include jus
Clerk yes. Please be sure to silence any phones or electronic devices. Items acted on today will appear on the november 5 board of supervisors calendar against otherwise stated. Chair peskin miss clerk, could you read items 1 through 5 together. Clerk yes. [agenda items read] chair peskin thank you, ms. Major. This is our triannual update to the aforementioned codes which requires their appeal and enactment of new 2019 editions. Here on behalf of the department of building inspection, we have bill stron and michelle yu if you would like to present on items 1 through 6, none of which seem to be very substantive in nature, but the floor is yours. Miss yu . Good afternoon, chair peskin and committee members. I am michelle yu, and with the help of d. B. I. Staff, i am responsible for helping customers with code questions, interpretation to the code as well as lead the code advisory committees. Agenda items 1 through 6 are six proposed amendments to adopt the code of the California Building