Conflict and therefore will not be present. And we have director lee. And we have the representative for the court and the joint powers board. And with that, director lee, and here. Lee, present. Director nuru in present. Harper present, and kim . Present. Madam chair you have a quorum. Do we have any communications or board of directors new or old business . Good morning, directors and members of the public, would i like to begin by thanking mayor lee, and the tax rates that were introduced in yul july and i would like to thank all of those in the process, and i have been in with, and working along our side and helping to move the project along and thank you very much and, you are support is valuable and now i would like to ask the counsel to provide a little more detail on the out come of the hearing this rate. And the counsel for the djpa, and the Transit Center, plan, provides, that in return for the permission, to build, the taller buildings, then allowed by the existing zoning, a
Would be subject to the special tax on the same basis of private property within the cft and that it affirmatively waives any dissent based on the fact of Public Ownership to any action to foreclose on the property in the event of nonpayment of the special tax. This to acknowledge recent statements that weve gotten from some of our public agencies including california tran and i have one more amendment on the item resolution calling for the special election. City county [inaudible] facility district. This is just an amendment on page 2, line 21. It merely states the date of the election. Further resolves this board of supervisors hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described above which election shall be held hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described above which election shall be held on december 29, 2014. I just want to reiterate that while we were very wary of the number of continuances in impacting the date of election and our ability to f
Comments first of all, supervisor mar thank you and our office to help to navigate that i was concerned wed have those two waring versions and end up having two versions at the board this is an issue that is resolveable and i think were motorcycling firmly in this direction i appreciate our willingness to work with the department and all the stakeholder on all sides of the issue to come up with a i wont think piece of legislation and want to acknowledging many power in my office that spent numerous amount of time over the last week to help to move it in a direction thank you you to him for that there are theres a board consensus with the voters in prop g we wanted to make sure we preserve the district and the quality and formula retail serves a role but really things on exist through formula retail we want to insure behave the right balance if youre neighborhood when you have too much of anything including 0 formula retail it can effect the uniqueness and character of the neighborhood
Question im glad supervisor wiener spoke line of questioning is clarified that theres consequences in this. Im just curious, and i dont know how much we can divulge on this, but what happened but it fell apart . Can you clarify . I guess rather than mean any specific names, i think that the issue is that the compromise were the new payment plan as a preferred to call it requires from the beginning that all 6 developers were agreeable. Otherwise if we dont get promises not to sue from all 6 its pointless because of one sues its the same as as if they all sued. So, we werent able to get that. There were 2 or 3 that were on board from the beginning and a couple that we couldnt get in the end. We thought we had assurances. We do have assurances in the beginning but minds change or something changed. So thats pretty much what happened. By late last week and began became clear we were not going to get the agreement from all the. Again, avoiding any names, there were several that were on boar
Items 2224 enhancer board. Supervisor can thank you. I will be the technical amendment rainout make a motion to adopt them. Again, theyre merely technical in nature. The one is on the 1st item the resolution to form this Community Facilities district on page 3. Lines 79 really just reflect that we had a continuance of this public hearing and whereas the board of supervisors opened a public hearing on september 2, 2014 and continued set public hearings to contact the night and whereas the board of supervisors continued a public hearing on september 9, 2014 and further continued the public hearing to september 23 4014 2014 and am finally on page 6 further resolved board of supervisors hereby acknowledges receipt and accept the terms of a statement from each of the 3 public agencies in accordance to government code 53111 in which he states that all or a portion of its land is intended to be transferred to private ownership that this would be subject to the special tax on the same basis of