I think breaking down those boundaries between different parts of government is very much something that weve seen and its translated into legislative action as well. Asset freezing recall, legislation that many countries have adopted. So a holding measure. E. U. Has done that. Switzerland has done that. Just after arab spring. A list of these persons, freeze their assets now. It is not a judicial freeze in the context of judicial action. It is an administrative freeze giving the countries time to prepare their judicial action. I think that sort of innovative legislation is happening. The civil forfeiture legislation that i think in america has been around for a very long time but in many other countries is still relatively new. You see that i wouldnt say proliferating but you see countries taking up those sort of legislations, so what we call nonconviction based legislation where you connect the asset to a crime. Typically on the balance of probabilities. Wont go into too many details
This property. Hes going to the Planning Department and saying you can get a variance on this property. Why would he say that . I couldnt get a variance. I dont understand why this even is being discussed. There is no difficulty here. This person bought the property with the intention of tearing down the house and building in the rear yard. This is not consistent with the neighborhood. Im also concerned about the future of this neighborhood if this is passed. If this is passed, my realtor is going to tell me that you can buy that house on 10 ord court and tear that thing down and build two big houses one 1 on state street and 5,000 square feet, you are going to have every developer in San Francisco or wherever this come from coming into our neighborhoods and tearing down the houses and building these monster buildings to replace the old housing that exist in there no you that is part of what we all love about our neighborhood. Good afternoon. My partner and i live at 26 ord court. We w
Also concerned about the future of this neighborhood if this is passed. If this is passed, my realtor is going to tell me that you can buy that house on 10 ord court and tear that thing down and build two big houses one 1 on state street and 5,000 square feet, you are going to have every developer in San Francisco or wherever this come from coming into our neighborhoods and tearing down the houses and building these monster buildings to replace the old housing that exist in there no you that is part of what we all love about our neighborhood. Good afternoon. My partner and i live at 26 ord court. We want to see housing density increased where appropriate. We strongly support owners right to develop properties to the full extent consistent with zoning and Design Guidelines of the city and we also agree that variances should be granted when there are compelling reasons to do so. We urge you to deny these projects and the variance. The structures of state street is out of scale and i find
This applicant obviously bought this property with the intention of tearing down the house in front. Now im sure he must have talked to his realtor and the realtor told him you are going to need a variance for this. I have been to the Planning Department. Why would a speculate or, he is speculating on this property. Hes going to the Planning Department and saying you can get a variance on this property. Why would he say that . I couldnt get a variance. I dont understand why this even is being discussed. There is no difficulty here. This person bought the property with the intention of tearing down the house and building in the rear yard. This is not consistent with the neighborhood. Im also concerned about the future of this neighborhood if this is passed. If this is passed, my realtor is going to tell me that you can buy that house on 10 ord court and tear that thing down and build two big houses one 1 on state street and 5,000 square feet, you are going to have every developer in San
Need a variance for this. I have been to the Planning Department. Why would a speculate or, he is speculating on this property. Hes going to the Planning Department and saying you can get a variance on this property. Why would he say that . I couldnt get a variance. I dont understand why this even is being discussed. There is no difficulty here. This person bought the property with the intention of tearing down the house and building in the rear yard. This is not consistent with the neighborhood. Im also concerned about the future of this neighborhood if this is passed. If this is passed, my realtor is going to tell me that you can buy that house on 10 ord court and tear that thing down and build two big houses one 1 on state street and 5,000 square feet, you are going to have every developer in San Francisco or wherever this come from coming into our neighborhoods and tearing down the houses and building these monster buildings to replace the old housing that exist in there no you tha