Been in the genes or something because you look at the travel that Teddy Roosevelt did in the amazon area, that trip i believe believe almost killed him didnt it . Heres an interesting fact for you to remember, theater roosevelt would get terribly seasick. He would vomit if he got on water. He had a bad stomach. He liked seen ahead of him, his favorite landscapes were flatland and prairie, now not only is expresident did he go to the amazon and do this incredible journey and he went to africa and spent a year recording Natural History of africa, i do not know if you realize that he came to your state and lived for a while in arizona hiking through the grand canyon he had saved. He then went and lived with native americas and wrote an article, he participated in a rattlesnake handling ceremony on his way from arizona into utah to see rainbow bridge. That is how committed he was, as x the president he wrote a very distinguished scientific piece on the tortoises of florida. Franklin roose
A group of legal and privacy analysts gave differing views on how the roles would affect consumers and businesses at a forum on capitol hill hosted by the congressional internet caucus committee. This is just over an hour. All right, folks. Welcome to another Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee briefing. Thanks, everyone, for coming to this recess briefing. Were going to try to do this really quickly in like one hour and explain this issue from a pro and con perspective. The briefing that youve walked into, in case youre in the wrong place, is the new fcc privacy rules for broadband providers. What will they mean for privacy . And this is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus itself, which is chaired on the house side by congressman Bob Goodlatte and congress wam eshoo and on the senate side by senator john thune and senator patrick leahy. We are super supportive, appreciative of their support a
Really quickly in like one hour and explain this issue from a pro and con perspective. The briefing that youve walked into, in case youre in the wrong place, is the new fcc privacy rules for broadband providers. What will they mean for privacy . And this is hosted by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus itself, which is chaired on the house side by congressman Bob Goodlatte and congress wam eshoo and on the senate side by senator john thune and senator patrick leahy. We are super supportive, appreciative of their support and the fact they allow us to host these briefings in conjunction with them in a fair and balanced way. And their ability to say we dont care where our particular perspectives are but we just want to actually have a good debate, pros and cons on these issues, and let, you know, Congressional Staff decide where they come out on the issue. So before i get going, just a few little bits of housekeeping.
Controls should bear the liability, and publishers should reject their ads. Are stakeholders adopting reasonable best practices and controls, in your view . Today that information does not suggest they are doing that. One of the challenges is reluctance to share information among each other. It is isolated now. Again, are recognizing that there is no perfect security in the absence of taking reasonable steps to protect the infrastructure and consumers from harm they should be responsible. How Many Americans do you think know that this problem exists . This information has been kept very quiet. Its been suppressed over years. The executives of some trade organizations have denied it exists publically. We just saw an example of that disputing the malvertising facts. Where did you get them since they dont share your view . We are fortunate. There are many players in the industry that see this as a major issue. This week we had a Dozen Companies come asking for legislation in the ecosystem
It should be down on a level three and level four building every three years. As i mentioned, its simply not occurring at this point in time. All right. My time is expired. I yield back. Thank you, chairman. Thank you. The chair recognizes miss norton. Thank you very much. I appreciate the hearing. There are chronic problems at fps. I would like to look at the difference between fps officers and contract guards. So we understand who is guarding these buildings. On page 2 of your testimony, you say you describe the Law Enforcement authority of fps officers. Specifically police powers, including enforcing federal laws and regulations, carrying firearms, et cetera. Then, of course, on page 5, of your testimony you distinguish these officers from the contract guards. Who this is a very important, i think, to just lay right here on the record is in your testimony. The pso rely on private person laws such as citizens arrest laws. So that means that they can no more than i can do in a Federal