plus, threats and dangerous rhetoric is at an all-time high and that has poll workers at an all-time low. how can democracy function when no one is there to ensure free and fair elections? dangerous times indeed as the 11th hour gets underway on this tuesday night. . . . ,. ,,. . ,. , called hageman to concede and she had this message for donald trump himself. i have said since january six, that i will take whatever it takes to ensure donald trump is never near the oval office and eat where again. and i mean it. she is not done and neither are we. we will have much more under the feet ahead, but we are also tracking a couple of primary races in alaska. republican senator lisa murkowski is facing several opponents but she is expected to survive a challenge from a trump endorsed opponent. former alaska governor and presidential candidate sarah palin who also has the former guy support was hoping to make a political comeback today. she competed in a special election for h
we can guess and we can speculate and ask, i think, the big mystery year at this point, what did he need or want the documents for? what was the purpose of ignoring a subpoena that asked for them back? what is the purpose of allowing his own lawyers to sign a document, saying that all classified information had been returned? and that is a big, big question that he is not answered. he s not really been asked. i think he, of course, is trying to change the subject, to make the issue about the behavior, and conduct of the investigators, which is something that works for him put ugly in the past. remember, during the whole russia investigation, it was always about the conduct of mueller and his team, rather than his own conduct. and that s what he s trying to do here, because it s worked politically. in the past. melissa murray, peter baker, thank you. i want to know about his future, his legal future. washington post reporting that he is struggling to find seasoned lawyers to work for
violence to keep himself in power. even though the voters had rejected him. he s a coward. a real man wouldn t lie to his supporters. he lost the election and he lost big. i know it, he knows it and deep down i think most republicans know it. the cheney family. as stewart family pointed out is a deep red conservative drive. far more conservative than donald trump s ever been. so what does her faith say about the party, a party that once embraced and honored her family? i think it says that it is donald trump s party right now, and it s not a party s steward said of ideology or particular philosophy or particular set of principles. it s a party but a single individual. that initial as donald trump. people are judged and based entirely on that metric. are you for trump or against trump? do you agree with him on the election of 2020 or not? that is the defining barometer at this point of that party.
whether it will stay like that we don t know. this is one election, one, day when year, we ll see what happens what happens going down the line. but at this point, despite all the trouble, despite all the investigations in the search in the fbi at his home and the idea that he s holding on to documents don t belong to him i belong to the government despite s own chief lawyers are targeted for criminal investigation in georgia, and his own financial officer is about to plead it looks like in new york, despite all those things with the republican party is saying is that they believe in donald trump. it s a big victory for him. he set out to punish those who stood against him. he is now successfully demonstrated, eight out of ten cases, and the rest of the republicans and the lesson they will take from that is don t dare speak out, because it will cost them. did you just hear all the despite the fact, i did 30 jumping jacks and had two cups of coffee during that time. it is enormous. ni
attorney general undermining the american people about when he made that rather unprecedented press conference announcement, just the other day, following the execution of the search warrant at mar-a-lago. it is typically not the case that the department of reveals the affidavit that might support a search warrant. typically, it really contains the details of the prosecution s case and chief, if there s going to be an indictment, and crimes charge. kathy affidavit, you basically have a blueprint for what that case might look like. and you have a head start in formulating a defense. so, it makes sense that this would be kept under wraps, and it makes sense that merrick garland would not reveal it, not only because it would reveal the case in chief, it might also revealed the sources that provided the information that supported the government s request for a search warrant, opening those individuals up to reprisal. i think is done what he can at this point, again, it s not typical for th