Page 34 - Discovery Process News Today

The board, and we are told, -- this is coming to light in a series of talks that will result in a record settlement cost, of 787 point $5 million, almost a billion dollars. so, we know the context. we are told it is definitely adding to pressure. it is in the mix. i think a lot is going on at this moment. >> according to your reporting, as you said, came to light during the discovery process of the case. why would fox lawyers not have alerted the fox board to something so incendiary? >> well, th...

Saying we need to know, america, the public needs to know what is going on behind the redactions that fox so desperately wanted to make sure that they wanted those redactions to stay in place so no one knew what was going on. whats interesting is this particular text from tucker cal son it a producer -- and listen, this may be an unpopular take. there is the possibility that this text message may have never seen the light of day. why? well, because the discovery process, in discovery when you se...

>> this is the beginning of the investigation. we started out questions. we dont have answers to the questions until they respond. if they dont respond appropriate we will sue them because of the discovery process. we want to know whether they misled. they have protection under federal law if their vaccine causes harm to individuals. but they dont have protection under state law if they misled consumers about the efficacy, the effectiveness of the vaccine or whether it stops the transmission of ...

Once it gets underway. of course, the big news this week, dividend -- might not have gone to trial, but the information that came out from the lawsuit has shaken the foundation of the network, as we saw this week, foxs top talent, tucker carlson, parted ways with a network. according to the new york times, the tipping point for executives, well, it might have been private messages revealed during the dominion suit, discovery process that contained what the paper called quote, highly offensive an...

Philippe matos. how does this new recording by the new york times track with what your client is alleging? >> well i mean the fish rots from the head down. so this is very clear to me, that the salty electronic exchanges, then became unredacted in a demeaning case, are very characteristic of the type of atmosphere that mr. carlson fomented, and countenanced in his news group. and form a great part of abbys case, in the southern district, ill just say also in terms of the three cases, dominion, s...

Salty electronic exchanges that were part -- then became un-redacted in the dominion case, are very characteristic of the type of atmosphere that mr. carlson fomented in his news group. a former great part of abbys case in the southern district, in terms of the three cases, i think abbys civil conspiracy case is kind of the connective sinew in terms of what happened and how the discovery process was really abused. it seems the attorneys were playing hide the ball instead of following the rules. ...

Obviously possibly extremely significant for the doj and for trump, comes amidst new reporting from the "wall street journal" about redacted messages in the dominion case that reportedly helped seal tucker carlsons fate at fox news. the journal says fox lawyers, quote, persuaded the court to redact from a legal filing the time carlson called a senior fox news executive the c-word. "outfront" now joe flint, a longtime media reporter who works for the "wall street journal." tell me what more are y...

What is the current state of what we know was sort of captured in the discovery process but never seen by the general public because the trial didnt happen? >> first, think about everything that we now know about the disparaging way that tucker carlson spoke about a president he pretended to be a champion of think about the way he spoke of his colleagues and the toxic workplace environment that he helped create. think about all of the things he has said on his air that didnt just tiptoe up again...

There is another outstanding lawsuit from a former tucker carlson producer named abby grose berg who sued the company and mr carlson saying that it was a hostile work environment. so whether that is connected to this at this point, we just dont know. it’s connected to this at this point, we just dont know.— just dont know. its interesting because weve _ just dont know. its interesting because weve had _ just dont know. its interesting because weve had those - just dont know. its interesting|...

Enough was enough. i just dont they just paid $800 million so they didnt have to apologize to any one of their viewers i mean they could have negotiated some ham-fisted, 3:00 in the morning on saturday morning. nothing. they paid what they paid so that they never had to apologize for the lies about the election. and the reason they did that is revealed in discovery process, that they were so scared of losing viewers to news max after the election and now that they left tucker carlson go, he had ...