Page 194 - Discrepancy News Today

Model. the differences between the two. how stark are they? and can you explain why there is that discrepancy between the two models? >> yeah. little changes, craig, that looking at different wind patterns, sometimes far away from the hurricane make a big difference in the forecast. the steering so far has been a high pressure over the atlantic. but the problem becomes you got a blocking high pressure and eventually losing the steering currents altogether. depending on how strong the models pick...

Just continues to go up. 140, 145, 140 and there it is towards the end of the forecast period, now by thursday, it will be very close to the u.s. mainland as a massive category 4 hurricane. that has not happened at least a 4 hasnt touched land since andrew in 1992. heres the cluster. this is why we had good agreement, then towards the end the models diverge. north florida, south carolina, perhaps north carolina. honing in on that, the ur o and american model. still a discrepancy there through th...

Where will it go from there? there is a discrepancy for where it will hit, some that hit towards south and north carolina, others go further to the north like jersey or virginia. one thing that has come into much better alignment is now almost every model has it hitting south of bermuda that puts it on a better track towards the u.s. were talking tuesday to wednesday of next week, but we still want to keep an eye on it. in addition, you will have these two invests right here that just came off o...

About. crime in the streets how much are we talking about far right protests and whos doing the talking where and for you valerie as a member of the online media can you just take us through the role that online media are playing in this deepening polarization and in what appears to be a certain discrepancy in terms of reporting on crime perpetrated by migrants because clearly many people who are going to the streets are people who feel that their streets are unsafe where is that coming from i f...

About. crime in the streets how much are we talking about far right protest and whos doing the talking where and for you valerie as a member of the online media can you just take us through the role that online media are playing in this deepening polarization and in what appears to be a certain discrepancy in terms of reporting on crime perpetrated by migrants because clearly many people who are going to the streets are people who feel that their streets are unsafe where is that coming from i fe...

About. crime in the streets how much are we talking about far right protest and whos doing the talking where and for you valerie as a member of the online media can you just take us through the role that online media are playing in this deepening polarization and in what appears to be a certain discrepancy in terms of reporting on crime perpetrated by migrants because clearly many people who are going to the streets are people who feel that their streets are unsafe where is that coming from i fe...

About. crime in the streets how much are we talking about far right protest and whos doing the talking where and for you valerie as a member of the online media can you just take us through the role that online media are playing in this deepening polarization and in what appears to be a certain discrepancy in terms of reporting on crime perpetrated by migrants because clearly many people who are going to the streets are people who feel that their streets are unsafe where is that coming from i fe...

Be true. and upon that proposition, hangs the decision that it reaches. and the question is, what happens when that proposition of fact actually in reality, you have referenced the real world so often, actually in reality turns out not to be true? what is the obligation of an appellate court if it has hung a decision on a proposition of fact and then the proposition of fact turns out not to be true? does it have any obligation to go back and try to clean up that discrepancy, to clean up that mes...

That it reaches. and the question is, what happens when that proposition of fact actually in reality, youve referenced the real world so often, actually in reality turns out not to be true? what is the obligation of an appellate court, if it is hung a decision on a proposition of fact and then the proposition of fact turns out not to be true, does it have any obligation to go back and try to clean up that discrepancy, to clean up that mess? >> senator, i think it is probably hard to answer that ...

Judge and everything pushed off. >> same question. >> its an iron clad argument. the authority for this is no less than senator grassley himself. and senator cornyn, the two people pushing back at the hearing today. both in 2010, i have the quotes here, said you cant let this kagan nomination go forward until we have all the documents. its unfair to the committee and the american people. you know, here, i do think its unfair to judge kavanaugh to have this proceeding go on, these documents are g...