Latest Breaking News On - District attorney didn t - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
have time to get a dry run and hear the evidence that the government might want to put on against them. he made some fair points when it came to the complexity. >> sure. >> we could have seen a case where the district attorney didn't need 2 1/2 years to investigate but came in quickly with a call -- a charge base -- >> but one of the things that i sense, of course, there's politics afoot with a district attorney who was elected and all the rest and bragg in new york. i do think that there is an incentive for district attorneys and the like to try to provide a disincentive for any politician trying to do this ever again. not just a president but a local alderman or a congressional candidate. this coordinated conspiracy about lying about an election
them at different times. it goes on and on. not to mention those waiting to have their case heard have time to get a dry run. and hear the evidence that the government might want to put on against them. so, he made some fair points when it came to the complexity. and that's the charging decision. we could have seen a case where the district attorney didn't need two-and-a-half years to investigate. but came in quickly with a call. a charge from early 2020. >> one of the things that i sense, of course, there's politics afoot with a district attorney. but i do think that there is an incentive for district attorneys and the like.
will release them as quickly as possible. they will get to see them a little before the public, but it depends on how quickly they want to release them to us how quickly we'll get to see them. and what about television cameras? where will they be allowed? are they allowed in the courtroom? do we know it's unclear news organizations, once again, including cnn have been pushing for more transparency here, and that includes having a camera in the courtroom. but the judge allowed both the prosecutors and the defense to weigh in on this. and while the district attorney didn't take a position, trump's attorneys to the clear position in opposition of having cameras in the courtroom anderson, they argued specifically that not only are there security concerns, but they say that having a camera in the courtroom for this historic arrangement would add to a quote his circus like atmosphere, and they also said that it would interfere with their clients. presumption of innocence now, historically, this judge has not been in favor. of having cameras in the courtroom, so the fact that the defense attorneys have argued against it. but it's not clear if we're actually going to
beforehand. we expect that unless they decide to do something different here that when he initially goes in for the first part of this process earlier in the afternoon that they should receive these charges now how quickly they become public. we hope that they will release them as quickly as possible. they will get to see them a little before the public, but it depends on how quickly they want to release them to us how quickly we'll get to see them. and what about television cameras? where will they be allowed? are they allowed in the courtroom? do we know it's unclear news organizations, once again, including cnn have been pushing for more transparency here, and that includes having a camera in the courtroom. but the judge allowed both the prosecutors and the defense to weigh in on this. and while the district attorney didn't take a position, trump's attorneys took a clear position in opposition of having cameras in the courtroom. anderson they argued specifically that not only are there security concerns, but they say that having a camera in the courtroom for this historic arrangement would add to a quote his circus like atmosphere, and they also said that it would
agenda, you would want to know that, wouldn't you? >> absolutely and i told them and i told the grand jury today i was deputy chief of the criminal division of the u.s. attorneys for the southern district. i said i wouldn't touch a witness like michael cohen for any amount. money. you simply cannot rely upon this guy. and tonight, he was on another station denying he waved the attorney/client privilege. here it is in writing and that's his signature on the second p page. so -- >> tucker: that's unbelievable. >> i guess he didn't know that and the district attorney didn't know that, and i told them "michael cohen's been in your office 20 times and twice in the grand jury and he forgot to tell you he waved the attorney/client privilege 22 times?" i mean really! is this the kind of witness you want to ride to the finish line? not in my book. >> tucker: i think all they care about is the finish line. i sure appreciate the information that you brought us tonight. >> you're quite welcome. >> tucker: thank you. >> you're welcome. thank you. >> tucker: harmid dillon is
"rust," when the gun he was handling went off killing halyna hutchins. hannah gutierrez-reed will autopsy be facing involuntary manslaughter charges. prosecutors allege she loaded the gun with a live round. >> i feel the district attorney didn't have a complete understanding of what it is that an actor does on set. >> reporter: the paramount+ drama "seal team" he's armorers. >> it is the actor's right to observe the gun getting loaded and check it. but it'snot their duty. they don't have to check the gun every time. they put the responsibility also a producer "s ae likely be raised in court. >> reporter: as a producer he might be responsible for all of the people he hired. so you're in a difficult situation because how do you defend? are you the actor? are you the producer? >> reporter: prosecutors intend to file those criminal charges in the coming days. cbs' news has learned that the
resulting in death and accessory after the fact -- meaning after the murder -- of first degree murder. helping somebody after the fact committing first degree murder and the district attorney didn't believe he could prove it, didn't bring the charges so he's lived with that for all these years. >> 20 years later, you have to special. let me tell everyone where they can watch it. it's a special report, the murder of jonbenet, tonight 9:00 eastern and pacific on cnn. jean casarez, thank you so much. >> thank you, brooke. now a number of police shootings across the state of georgia has put law enforcement on edge. six officers have been shot in as many days, two of them killed. that shooting happened last wednesday in americus, georgia. since then, four more officers were shot and injured in separate incidents in two other towns. nick valencia is following the story from atlanta. six officers. why? >> six days, six officers, two of them shot fatally, brooke. this spate of shootings in georgia perhaps the worst we've
with the run, to not cooperating, the fight on the ground. mr. scott coming after me while we were on the ground in the chest area coming at me again. cold fear that mr. scott didn't stop, continued to come toward me. >> unarmed, running away from the officer, not toward him does his defense any sense? >> he doesn't have much of a defense at all. i'm shocked we didn't get a conviction in this case. that video is so clear, i think what might have happened is either the judge who gave them the information regarding the laws and the stipulations of the laws, may have done something wrong for all i know. maybe the district attorney didn't make his case good enough.
justin bieber. >> the kid is 19 years old. granted, his parents didn't give him a great foundation, he's not doing anything that another 19-year-old wouldn't be doing. there's not a 19-year-old alive that if he didn't have the money, he wouldn't have a ferrari. he needs a foundation. that's what lindsay lohan didn't have. where ronny howard did. >> all these people surrounding him need to say no. >> yes, but it comes back along before that. his parents pushed him and didn't give him a foundation, so now he's 19 and he's not doing it. so, but i -- what i find wrong is yes, somebody should say no to him and somebody should help guide him and usher who brought him in should sit him down and say, look, dude, let's do this. >> obviously, that would be great if bieber did have people around him now to help keep him
serious. >> the district attorney didn't think it was very funny at all. they were charged late on friday, charged with third degree felonies and it's a mess for them. once this video was put online, it took on a life of its own. these are ex boy scout leaders, supposed to set the tone of leadership. they were leading a boy scout troop through goblin valley park in utah and they have a very interesting defense, saying the rock was precariously positioned and they were fearing for the safety of someone that could have walked by. this could have crushed somebody, they say they would do it again. >> really? well, it's interesting that they would would make that attempt on that kind of defense when the video, the tone says they were joking. it was fun. it was like just a challenge. nowhere at least on the videotape that people have seen on youtube does it express a concern for passers by. >> this is a serious offense. third degree felony and if convicted, five years, $5,000.