State of Minnesota County of St. Louis District Court Judicial District: 6th Court File Number: 69DU-PR-22-13 Case Type: Probate In Re the Estate of William Martin Terry Decedent Notice and Order for Hearing on Petition for Formal Adjudication of Intestacy, Determination of Heirship, and Appointment of Personal Representative and Notice to Creditors It is ordered and notice is given that on April 5th, 2022 at 1:45 p.m. a hearing will be held at the courthouse in Duluth, Minnesota for the formal adjudication of intestacy and determination of heirship of the Decedent, and for the appointment of: Name: Josephine Terry Address: 1170 W. Royal Oaks Drive, Shoreview, MN 55126 as Personal Representative of the Estate of the Decedent in: an unsupervised administration. Any objections to the petition should be filed with the Court prior to or raised at the hearing. If proper and if no objections are filed or raised, the personal representative will be appointed with full power to administer the
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS DISTRICT COURT PROBATE DIVISION SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Court File No.: 69DU-PR-22-41 In Re: Estate of James Albert Kaping, a/k/a James Kaping, Decedent. NOTICE AND ORDER FOR HEARING ON PETITION FOR FORMAL PROBATE OF WILL AND APPOINTMENT OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND NOTICE TO CREDITORS. It is Ordered and Notice is given that on March 22, 2022 at 1:45 pm, a hearing will be held in this Court at the St Louis County courthouse-Duluth, 100 North Fifth Avenue W, Duluth, Minnesota 55802, for the adjudication of intestacy and determination of heirs of the decedent and for the appointment of Clark James Kaping, 4808 Anderson Rd, Hermantown, Minnesota 55811, as personal representative of the decedent’s estate in an unsupervised administration. Any objections to the petition must be raised at the hearing or filed with the Court prior to the hearing. If the petition is proper and no objections are filed or raised, the personal representative will be appo
Derek Chauvin’s attorneys filed a complaint on Tuesday seeking to throw out the first verdict and have a new trial, citing a whole host of reasons including jury intimidation and “fear of retribution,” as well as jury misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct and more.
The filing in the Fourth Judicial District Court argues a new trial should be granted “on the following grounds: the interests of justice; abuse of discretion that deprived the Defendant of a fair trial; prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”
It goes into greater detail, talking about media coverage in particular, and the court’s curious decision not to change venues.
What are the questions for potential jurors in the trial over the death of George Floyd? nytimes.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from nytimes.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.