Page 85 - Dna Sample News Today

States exhibit 66, the last one for the record was 64. states exhibit 68, is this what you were talking about, the back of his head -- or side of his had he over here? >> yes. there was more than one on the back of his head. >> thats two on the back of his head, too. is that correct? >> i believe i could see it bleeding from two different areas. >> okay. >> did you on the 27th of february, the next day, end up coming into contact with him and were you present when a dna sample was taken from the...

The difference between the police taking a dna sample and fingerprinting you? >> i dont know. you know, i guess because to fingerprint you, arent they supposed to charge you with a crime? i think that you should have to be charged with a crime before theyre allowed to do any of that to you. you know, they need to arrest you and officially charge you with a crime. >> lets just move to bradley manning. bradley manning, the wikileaks soldier, there is a 21-year-old soldier who finds all this stuff ...

Piers, as we get into this grilling, i may not be as good as you want because this year when i went to mexico, i did not watch any television from january 2nd until about two weeks ago, and i still havent watched the news yet. >> i can fill you in on any of the gaps. im sure it wont take you long. let me ask you this. what is the difference, what is the difference between the police taking a dna sample and fingerprinting you? >> i dont know. you know, i guess because to fingerprint you, arent th...

Vacant so president obama cannot get his nominees on a court that important. president obama we are told today will be nominating three judges for that court tomorrow in a ceremony that will be held in the most unsubtle place in the world. the rose garden. >> a divided decision about dna. if you are arrested if are a serious crime, they can force you to give a dna sample even if you dont want to. it was a 5-4 decision, but not the conservative-liberal split. scalia was joined in his position by ...

And vehicle a harder and harder time keeping secrets from citizens. in the strange new world, citizens too are having a harder and harder time keeping their secrets from their government. that brings me to the other big story out of washington. the supreme court ruled in a 5-4 decision that people who are arrested, not convicted, but arrested can be forced to take a cotton swab and give up a dna sample that can be stored in a government database. when you think about the secrets you hold as a pe...

Answer to the question, can you keep a secret is no. no, you cant. the government is the world over and vehicle a harder and harder time keeping secrets from citizens. in the strange new world, citizens too are having a harder and harder time keeping their secrets from their government. that brings me to the other big story out of washington. the supreme court ruled in a 5-4 decision that people who are arrested, not convicted, but arrested can be forced to take a cotton swab and give up a dna s...

Decision. whats going on here? >> wolf, dna is used as an investigative fotool all over t country. and the question has been, how far can the police go? the answer is pretty far. this is one of the most important search and seizure cases in years. the supreme court deciding that when police get a dna sample its a minor intrusion to a person who has already been placed under arrest. its not just csi anymore. all 50 states have passed laws allowing dna testing after a criminal defendant is convict...

. all right this just into cnn, one of the new u.s. supreme court ruling, moments ago, the justices ruled felony criminal suspects can be subjected to a police dna test after arrest. thats before trial and conviction. cnn crime an justice correspondent joe johns is live in washington. so that means if im arrested for a felony crime, they can just takepy dna -- take my dna, i have no say in it? >> reporter: serious crime, carol. this is a state out of the case of maryland. its called maryland v...

Before the court and im going to bripg in pete williams. this is basically the question of whether or not you can take dna from someone whos been arrested, but presumed innocent, correct? >> all states take dna from victim of crimes, this is once theyre arrested, but not convicted of a crime. half the state do this and the support upheld the practice. what the challenge said is youre taking dna from somebody you dont suspect of committing another crime. theres no probable cause, police dont have...

Morning, everybody. several breaking stories. of course, the death of frank lautenberg, the oldest u.s. senator and last surviving world war ii vet in the senate. were going to have msnbcs steve kornacki talking about new jersey politics, what it means in florida as well. plus, a major rulining from the supreme court. police can take a dna sample without a warrant to do so. plus, the man who secretly recorded mitch mcconnell and his stuff during a campaign strategy session finally breaking his s...