Page 69 - Do Over News Today

Criticized your case as taking a case against bill cosby because you wanted to make a political point. they didnt feel the evidence was there. how do you respond to people who say you are going to be trying a man a second time, you didnt get a conviction the first time, why do it the second time. wanted to give you a chance to respond. >> sure. sure. as the court indicated in this, this is a do-over. we start again and just because a verdict was not reached in one case doesnt mean it wont be rea...

To trial. the timeline is shortened having to retry within a year. how many of the judges prior rulings apply in this next try of the case and how often do you expect those same issues or perhaps new ones to come up again? >> okay. this is where i wish our great folks from the appeals unit were standing next to me. as i said, i dont have a whole lot of experience being in this position. but its my understanding that its really a do-over. in terms of the veneer, for example, we start back to wher...

>> sure, sure, as the court indicated in this, this is a do-over. we start again and just because, you know, a verdict was not reached in one case doesnt mean it wont be reached next time around. and we dont know why it wasnt reached, but theres no guarantee as to a result in a case. this is our system and we put it before a group of jurors. and the second part i think of your question there. this case is about a drug facilitated sexual assault and it doesnt matter, you know, what you look like ...

Those attorneys who conspired like gloria allred, tell them to go back to law school and take another class. >> that was bill cosbys spokesperson, andrew wyatt. joining me is trial attorney and legal analyst ann bremner. take a look at gloria allred. >> the court only allowed one such prior bad act witness to testify. that was my client, kelley johnson. rather than the 13 such witnesses which the prosecution wanted to call. if the court allows more accusers to testify next time, it might make a ...

Our great folks from an appeals unit were standing next to me. as i said, i dont have a whole lot of experience being in this position. but its my understanding that its really a do-over. so, you know, in terms of the-- for example, we start to where we began, and so it would have to be a new motion for change of venue and the steps. now, i anticipate if we have the same judge, which i expect to have in this, that hes familiar with the legal issues, so, that should expedite things a whole bunch ...

President went to europe, he spoke at nato headquarters and everybody expected that he was going to endorse article 5, which he had never explicitly endorsed that says an attack against one is an attack against all. its a defense mechanism. so if for example romania were attacked, theres a commitment by all of the countries, including united states, they would come to romanias defense. so the president, while he lectured the need to spend 2% on their gdp, he did not endorse article 5, which was ...

Testimony. identifying some contacts, but not identifying a possible third contact being reported tonight with the russian ambassador. what does that mean to the attorney general? there was already talk of possible perjury in his first version of that answer. >> lawrence, look, if this is true, then the attorney general has to resign. as you noted, his first answer to senator franken, youre going to have him on in a few minutes was incomplete and inaccurate. he has asked for a do-over. in the do...

What does that mean to the attorney general? there was already talk of ssible perjury in his first version of that answer. >> lawrence, look, if this is true, then the attorney general has to resign. as you noted, his first answer to senator franken, youre going to have him on in a few minutes was incomplete and inaccurate. he has asked for a do-over. in the do-over, he did not mention this other meeting. it is hard to understand how he could have inadvertently left out a second meeting after he...

The expense of the trump administration. >> so, mr. comey, i thought if you came back for one last meeting we could straighten things out. please, sit down. >> i am sitting, mr. trump. >> well, then kneel down. i want to talk to jim alone. >> huh? >> yeah, sure, mr. president. >> look, i want a do-over. i have no tapes. lets make a deal. you hand over all your notes and ill erase the tapes -- i mean, there are no tapes! no tapes! >> what is it? why are the walls moving in on me. >> they say some...

Rushed out. as far as what the president has the power to do, it is legal. obviously some judges disagreed. there were significant changes and overhaul to the specifics of the policy and they did a do-over. now it is harder to make the case that the president has overstepped his presidential or constitutional authority, especially given the fact that some of those legal challenges were specifically addressed in those changes. >> shannon: maybe not necessarily in the ninth circuit. well stand by ...