The mother and the father. Remember, in the trial below the experts on the plaintiffs side conceded there are differences between mothering and fathering, there are different benefits for each one. Judge daughtrey what is the rational basis for excluding everybody else . I mean, it doesnt cut down on the procreation of children, interfere with the pro creation of children just because you got two people of the samesex marrying and in some of those marriages, one of them, one of the partners is able to procreate. Aaron linstrom first i have to point out that the rational basis with a different view, that is flipping the question. The robison case lays this out very clearly by the United States Supreme Court where it points out that the question for rational basis for view is whether the state interest that is being put forward, if its being vabsed by including a first group and by including a second group that does not advance that interest is not irrational, it does not extend benefits
Current clergy will be required to solemnize the marriage. Religious conflict is not a basis for denying fundamental rights. If and when the case was presented the court would have to balance competing Constitutional Rights the way it always has. The court is required to do this. You look at the hierarchy of rights and the level of intrusion. The court would render a decision. We have alleged that intermediate scrutiny applies here because plaintiffs as gay and lesbian persons qualify because of class status. We renew that argument here and differ to the brief and the wonderful brief of the lot institution professors. Just briefly we believe the Equality Foundation could be revisited. It does not require a decision because there is an inconsistent decision, Equality Foundation was inconsistent with the Supreme Court that requires modification. The decision, it could be the court a class the applies the cleburne factors. Davis scarborough did not have to address the standard of scrutiny
Mr. Scarborough we will close the formal part of our press conference. If you have a question, we are glad to entertain. I kid you not call for taking time out of your busy schedules to cover this information. God bless you all. [inaudible conversations] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] the Supreme Court hears arguments today in two cases regarding samesex marriage. The case is from michigan and ohio will determine whether states are required to issue licenses to same sex couples. And whether states must recognize marriages performed in other states. Well be live outside of the court and possibly comments from the dispenser. Beginning at 4 00 p. M. , we will bring you the audio of the arguments. That is live on cspan3. Coming up, the swearingin ceremony for the new attorney general, Loretta Lynch. Then Charles Grassley speaks at the National Press club at the department about his de
Void in ohio . It depends. The way the courts undertake the choice of law analysis is to say outofstate marriage is only voidable, we will recognize it here even if it is unlawful here. That is the First Cousins marriage case. For other types of marriages, if the marriage would be deemed void, which ohio courts would take to mean commonlaw is not recognized and would not be recognized. The henry sales case, that was an instate ohio marriage, a commonlaw marriage. The court established the rule that it was absolutely void and the court would not recognize it. That void versus voidable is the distinction, not samesex marriage versus opposite sex marriage. That is one example for why i think baker is controlling. Another distinction may try to make is to say that there is a substantive due process right not to marry, but marriage recognition. I do not even think you need to get to the analysis, because under the Supreme Court cases and this courts cases, when you have a specific provision
Kind of like a subset of it. He ended up within the structure, the guidance, what we are still drafting. Subject to discussion. Section three, integrated and roles. That is where we plan to introduce enterprise risk management. One thing i did not speak of, a month ago we updated omb circular a11 to introduce enterprise risk management. Youor the audience, could let everyone know what a111 is. Guidance,ur budget what we send out to the agencies how they request their budget and how they execute the budget. To get things done, you really need to connect the budget process. We wanted to get that first introducedere, and enterprise risk management. We plan to break that often must right now it is so heavily the hold back and meant the whole document comes across as financial reporting. That makes sense. Appendix b is with charge cards. We are reviewing that. Codifiesharge act existing things, but we are working on the first congressional report for all findings. A lot of the findings are