addressing. which is these two reporters who are actual reporters seem to have the receipts. they have evidence that goes beyond one person s word against the other. so the attempt to set up a he said he said about this is utterly irrelevant if there are texts and e-mails and contemporary documentdatio contempora contemporary documentation. the triumph of greed that we re already in an environment where we re expecting hyper partisans to say lying doesn t matter. again you run into the cold hard facts not of just this case but history. i m not sure they have the documents. they have two federal law enforcement source who s have told them that this is what it s based on, those receipts, the documents, the text messages. and so we just don t exactly know. but if they do if they do. that is certainly well beyond michael cohen. and the timeline is interesting too. which is that they had that information, according to the story and these two law enforcement officials, before they