That we see in the coarse of this, but to me, it s another example. i don t see any reps standing up and saying clarence thomas should be remove from court. they don t say any of that, and now they re accepting the fact that immense corruption and rot at the supreme court, it is the furthest away you could get from a servant leader and believer in the constitution. matt, we were part of the republican party at a time when the supreme court, the makeup of it, and its decisions on hotbed cultural brought republicans to the poll, than repelling them. how to democrats implement a successful strategy of making voters understand that they re the only ones with a card to play, right? with any agency, if they don t
Know are untrue, so there are things that are happen, but the public-facing version would be critical. if it s not in the news, if we re not thinking about it, you know, it might just go away unless everyone in the senate watches your show, which they should, but i don t know if they do. i think if anyone is looking for political courage, they should find it in the poll numbers, only 3% of all merges approve of the supreme court. 6 is% disapprove, and its decisions are getting opposition from many, many more americans, upwards of 70%, 80%, opposing some of hoot button decision. thank you, with your help maybe we ll stay on it. matt and molly stick around. for more news and analysis on the supreme court and all the big legal stories with he cover here, sign up for our newsletter.
Is a bill that would have a more binding code of conduct with more it would have a binding code of conduct and a bunch of other things that would improve the ethics. it passed through the judiciary committee last year, awaiting action on the floor, but it s been waiting for action for a very long time. the house will not doing anything with it. the senate could theoretically pass it, but it s a raidsor thin authority, and it s likely that the jon testers and joe manchins of the world don t want to vote for that bill. i think that is a calculation being made by the majority leader. i think information is power. holding senate hearings, having more senate briefings, there is stuff going behind the scenes, there is investigations into some of the alito statements we
Redwoods in california, can you pay for it. if you want to go to indonesia, you can pay for it. you shouldn t be relying on a connection to a megabillionaire. and the rv was a $300,000-plus gift wait for it from harlan crow. i think the reporting is important, it s a great complement to the work that propublica has done. what it makes clear is all of the justices are receives gifts, but no one in the expansiveness that justice thomas has. if you think about the period in which this study took place, justice thomas during that period drew a salary from the supreme court, and the total of the salary for all of those years was about $4 million, roughly equivalent to the amount of gifts that he took in as
This moral and political decision to make about that character. they say, who do i want to be? who do i want to grow up to be? do i want to be someone like a liz cheney, an adam kinzinger, or am i going to do what everybody else in this cult is doing? do i want to be like jd vance, do i want to say the things donald trump wants? i think you re seeing the way the party is going. but the fear of being excommunicated, the fear of no longer being part of that tribe is so of that tribe is so dominant and pervasive, i find it bizarre, because it s not that great to be part of that particular tribe these days, is it? also, rev, it s engaged in the greatest shift to an autocracy that the planet has seen. i accept that explanation for jd