majority used it in interpreting the affordable care act. it s easy for a justice to hold on to a principle until it requires an outcome that doesn t align with that justice s preferences. so maybe scalia should shelf his insult shtick until he starts exhibiting the same hypocrisy he finds so galling in his colleagues. he ll tell us everything he knows very shortly, sir. as you were. where were we? 13 serving 14! service! if your boss stops by, you act like you re working. it s what you do. if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it s what you do.
like this. they missed a whole bunch of facts. the embargo has been very unpopular around the world and the pope, this whole angle on the pope, the previous pope and this pope has been against the embargo for a long time. this is nothing new. but you didn t get that in the coverage. this seems like a brand new thing. violations it s been well documented were certainly de-emphasized. r. you know, if you look at the editorial of all these newspapers, you have the bifurcation, a strong democratic market and strong republican. so we re living in a bizarre world situation here where it doesn t align politically. you see them in the media coverage. you see them in the new york times. the new york times was very much for what the president did,
like this. they missed a whole bunch of facts. the embargo has been very unpopular around the world and the pope, this whole angle on the pope, the previous pope and this pope has been against the embargo for a long time. this is nothing new. but you didn t get that in the coverage. this seems like a brand new thing. violations it s been well documented were certainly de-emphasized. r. you know, if you look at the editorial of all these newspapers, you have the bifurcation, a strong democratic market and strong republican. so we re living in a bizarre world situation here where it doesn t align politically. you see them in the media coverage. you see them in the new york times. the new york times was very much for what the president did,
like this. they missed a whole bunch of facts. the embargo has been very unpopular around the world and the pope, this whole angle on the pope, the previous pope and this pope has been against the embargo for a long time. this is nothing new. but you didn t get that in the coverage. this seems like a brand new thing. violations it s been well documented were certainly de-emphasized. r. you know, if you look at the editorial of all these newspapers, you have the bifurcation, a strong democratic market and strong republican. so we re living in a bizarre world situation here where it doesn t align politically. you see them in the media coverage. you see them in the new york times. the new york times was very much for what the president did,
democratic friends. i think it will empower individual campaigns. i d much rather have a transparency ta way as opposed to having outside groups come in i have to answer to. accountability is what s so important. a candidate s campaign organization, campaigns run bad ads to be sure. but they re much more accountable and responsive if they miss lead, if they misstate facts. they ve got to respond and take down an ad. it s the super pacs that have the least amount of accountability in the civility. i m not a fan of disarming the political parties. 40% of our countries doesn t align with republicans or democrats and feel like there s something missing in the center. that s where there is the ability for social media, people engage in their communities and kind of try to rebuild that sense. part of this is money but part is getting people to engage in policy, engage in politics in a way that allows us to rebuild a sensible center.