Page 10 - Doesnt Apply News Today

Right. part of the reason we have a great military is because were highly trained, were professional, and the uniform code of military justice guides that. were a nation of laws and the rest of the community understands when the u.s. military fights they fight with the highest level of professionalism and are guided by the rule of law. and when you have a commander and chief of who seems to believe that that code -- that doesnt really apply if he decides it doesnt apply, to me, its really about ...

Of course she could stay her ruling while its appealed. it could be appealed and that would take months to resolve. and so im curious to exactly how she writes the opinion, and whether other people reading it will go and testify even if its appealed. >> so i want to draw that out for a minute because there are a number of other former and current trump administration officials who are currently not obeying subpoenas from house democrats. some of them have said the white house told me not to go. ...

Called as a witness because they have put out these three questions. and while they would -- on their face seem to exclude calling in hunter biden, so some have suggested they were trying to protect the bidens, the way they have tailored those three questions, they apply completely to the whistleblower. the only person on capitol hill who knows hot whistleblower is sounds like -- although the whistleblower attorney has said that the only person who knows the identity are members of the intel com...

Immunity says that this kupperman can fight this and doesnt need -- and shouldnt go in. h whos right here? >> the answer is this hardly ever happen, so were not sure. the position of community has been taken by white houses and departments of justice going back for quite a while. one federal district court has said that, you know, that immunity doesnt apply. chairman schiff raises what i think will be the first issue that the court will have to decide, can a court even get involved at this point...

Testify. his lawyer said theyll let the courts decide whether or not he should testify even though he was formally issued a subpoena. it seemed that adam schiff the chairman said, you know what, well move on and not waste a whole lot of time going through court proceedings right now. >> well i think kupperman will be forced to testify and they will uphold executive privilege doesnt apply. >> but it will take a while to get that decision. >> i hope it wont. that they will make a decision that kup...

Today, the erg, the hardline team who does not support theresa may some of them are in government, but a tweet to say that the erg recommends mps vote for this deal. this is a big development. they are not a homogeneous group. but if some come on board, theyll be for boris johnson. >> he has opposition? >> this takes into account other mps or abstaining votes. >> is there any feeling similarly to what we had that with the voting, because lets just get brexit done? lets get brexit done, rather th...

Leading up to this testimony today between the white house lawyers and fiona hills lawyers about what exactly she could say. the white house didnt go as far as to exert executive privilege and say, we dont think she can testify at all. that had been a big question. but they did lay out several areas where they said, we think this is covered by executive privilege, communications with the president, diplomatic conversations. we think she should not be able to talk about these things. fiona hills ...

And say, we dont think she can testify at all. that had been a big question. but they did lay out several areas where they said, we think this is covered by executive privilege, communications with the president, diplomat conversations. we think she should not be able to talk about these things. fiona hills lawyers pushing back and saying, look, there is an implication here that there is wrongdoing by the government and executive privilege doesnt apply in that instance. and basically where thing...

Blows a whistle on something and they say its government money they get a portion of that money which doesnt apply here but the rules are you have to have information that other people have to be a whistle blower. if there is another person that had firsthand knowledge that would have more credibility than the first one. >> neil: where is this going? >> im not sure the second whistle blower makes a difference given the fact we have a transcript of this call and the voters who are looking at this...

Only one stating back to the 1940s has there ever been a penalty of $250,000 that high reached. that is the jurisdictional limit that we were able to levy for a discriminatory act. in fact in most situations, whether or not theres even a decision to levy a penalty is made by looking at the circumstances of each individual case, including, of course, the size of the entity, the circumstances underlying, sophistication. in many instances fines are not even levied. >> housing and public accommodati...