Page 2 - Doesnt Attack News Today

Against these people, would you then agree with the attack? >> no, i think i would take assad out. i would do a osama bin laden, lets take out bashar al assad, instead of killing a bunch of people, really not sure who else we kill in the meantime, we may kill people that are friendly to us, syrian military. here is another thing, think about this one second. >> for the record here, you would not go in and take out, try to degrade. >> no. here is the other thing, once we go in and do this, bob, i...

Safer, less safe, i can make it crystal clear to you, israel will be less safe unless the united states takes this action. iran and hezbollah are two of the three biggest allies of assad. and iran and hezbollah are the two single biggest enemies of israel. if iran and hezbollah are advantaged by the united states not curbing assads use of chemical weapons, there is a much greater likelihood that at some point down the road hezbollah, who has been one of the principal reasons for change in the si...

>> i also emphasize, if it is the wrong resolution, it can do just as much damage in my view. thank you. >> senator udall? >> thank you very much. i thank all of the witnesses for their testimony and for their service here today and i also want to thank chairman menendez for the way he has conducted this hearing. like everyone here, i deplore what bashar al assad has done to his people by attacking them with chemical weapons. >> you are listening to senator john mccain and a hearing thats contin...

Did that change your mind. no. why is it just us, bob? are the french, brits, germans against the geneva convention or whatever the red line originally signed that said -- are they against that? are they okay with human rights atrocities? >> theyre not. >> why arent they joining us. if it is so bad and theyre so sure, why arent they with us? >> besides the british and maybe the french, they dont have military capability to do what we need to do to degrade the forces, united states is the only on...

The attack have been engineered to look like assad because of obamas red line comment. number two, is there a way to punish syria strongly while not assisting people who hate us. thats the key. or can we hit them both? i mean, we keep telling the people relax, it is not a war, it is not a bombing, it is not an attack, it is an action. i would like it to be all three if were going to -- if it means we win. >> the free syrian army does like us, theres a difference here. the distinction ought to be...

Missiles in that area, the answer is no. >> al qaeda doesnt? >> we have been fighting al qaeda ten years, now you tell me they cant shoot from syria to syria? >> it is a specific missile. excuse me. let me give you a lesson. you can deliver missiles with war heads on top. to deliver missiles with poison gas, entirely different trajectory, and you dont do it with that kind of missile. >> you can though. easier to deliver say a nuclear missile, which you couldnt deliver, you dont have the right te...

To help explain to the viewers. john kerry, secretary of state, alluded to the convention against use of chemical weapons, but i dont think anybody quite remembers, they havent made the case. it was a fairly good point he made. >> even i am not old enough to remember it in real time, but after the first world war when there was indiscriminate use of mustard gas, a lot of people were hurt, there was an agreement reached by virtually every country in the world that there would no longer be use of ...

For the middle east and iran and israel basically having a faceoff through syria? >> i wrote this, help me out here. see if i got this straight. al qaeda hates assad, israel, qatar, turkey, hate assad, iran, hamas hate israel, america supports develop. iran, hamas, syria, muslim brotherhood, can i just suggest we stay the hell out of this place for now? figure out whats going on, not get involved. it is a powder keg. why light the match. >> why then would we get involved? >> allies. americans at...