the ruling in general is basically driven by there is no urgency here, so, the president, we need to see this we being the legal system we need to take a look at this. they are not upholding the stated law. they are not. you quoted the law perfectly in your talking points. a judge should have the field of dresses in front of him or her, which should become of the national security, the security, and the interest of the plaintiff. the interest of the plaintiff, the state of washington, is not primary. in fact, the state of washington does not have an interest. it is students from another country in the state of washington that does not tip the scales. let me tell you something, bill. the reason of the state of washington is suing is because they know the appeal goes to the most laughed at bill: one of the judges is a republican appointed by bush the younger. it is too easy to dismiss it in a knee-jerk. i will make a prediction, the
extremely vetted? after some of the comments you made, yes. i m just being humorous. bill: marketing the little high school student, watters. i feel so bad about it, too. bill: did any of them know anything? they could name a few countries that were on the list. you know what they said which was strange, i think they got it from somewhere. they said trump is not banning people from countries he does business with. so, i said, is there a trump tower and afghanistan? and they just sat there with a blank stare. bill: okay. so, how many high school kids did you talk to? probably about a dozen. bill: okay. did any of them have any idea about this issue? i would say no. okay. so, none of them? there were hundreds of them out there. so, they were there, basically, for social reasons, because their friends were there and this was skipping school, right? did you ever walk out of class, when other kids do it,
whether, did she break a technical rule or not. the point is, showed this man, with a racist past, and who says that to bill: that is your opinion. no, no, that is not an opinion. bill: he was never branded a racist by anybody. excuse me, but i think that nobody has come forward, not one republican has come forward to dispute bill: sure, they have. excuse me, to dispute what coretta scott king said about him, which is that he tried to bill: i m not sure whether anybody delved into that case 31 years ago. but 52 republican senators voted him attorney general. many of whom are you saying that senatorsn the united states would vote a racist absolutely. they have done it in the past. bill: i don t think it is fair to brand him a racist. as i said, it has never been proven in any way, shape, or form. he is put forth his point of
no, no, that is not an opinion. bill: he was never branded a racist by anybody. excuse me, but i think that nobody has come forward, not one republican has come forward to dispute bill: sure, they have. excuse me, to dispute what coretta scott king said about him, which is that he tried to bill: i m not sure whether anybody delved into that case 31 years ago. but 52 republican senators voted him attorney general. many of whom are you saying that senatorsn the united states would vote a racist absolutely. they have done it in the past. bill: i don t think it is fair to brand him a racist. as i said, it has never been proven in any way, shape, or form. he is put forth his point of view, u.s. attorney in alabama, he prosecuted racists, put racists in prison. he did civil rights legislation aggressively. you can think he is.
b.s. you have to be an idiot to believe that. if you hate hillary clinton, you might. it goes the other way, too. bill: i m going to dispute two and a general, nonspecific way. since i have been in this business, 40 years now, i have seen standards drop dramaticall dramatically. the editorship, where did you get it, who said it, both sides of the story. you know what the con is now, goldberger? you know what the con is now? the liberal press writes articles and all the interview are liberal people that don t identify them as such. i see this over and over and over again. they never tell the reader who is saying these quotes. so, they stack it, six or seven. that is not fake news, that is contrived news. as it is in the same soup can,