the motivation and what was taking place in the immediate aftermath of this incident. and what would police be doing right now then? so now that the shooter is deceased they can t interview him. we have seen incidents in the past where they go down a certain number of ways either the person is you know walks up to law enforcement as we just saw in el paso a month ago turned himself in. we have seen incidents where the subject will turn the weapon on themselves and kill themselves. we have seen incidents where they engaged by police and they are dead. the latter is what appears to have happened here that makes it more difficult on law enforcement they can t question and glean information regarding the motivation so they have to work out from there circle the target positively identify him. we haven t heard from officials they ve done the positive identification. there have been ins stands where someone doesn t have identification so they have other means. perhaps cell phone registra
someone who doesn t look american will be. the law specifically said that police cannot use that. examples arizona has a terrible smuggling problem. it is speeding or no tail light. you can see it is overcrowded and jammed with people . the driver doesn t have identification. the policemen thinks he is acting evasively. that is reasonable suspicion. that is going to be defined as a group of circumstances and not a person s appearance or shoes or anything like that. byron, thanks for coming on with your take on this. thanks for having me. meanwhile, a woman s home completely demolished. but the wrecking crew knocked down the wrong house. how did this happen? and one principal is trying