history of fox news. jessica: i think about this little bit differently. as no surprise to that one. melissa: that s why we love you. jessica: i m not a fan of jim comey. we know democrats and republicans have reasons to dislike him. thank you for that email stuff, jim. we bemoaned the number of leaks and the level of disinformation that comes out of these closed-door hearings all the time. this guy ran, the senator ran to his favorite reporter and said this was what with the said, we are that with the kavanaugh stuff as well. hearing about what s going on with the fbi, people saying they said they weren t there, so it didn t happen. which doesn t mean it didn t happen. my impression was that jim comey wanted to testify publicly so that he could be very clear and certain about what he is saying and not get his words [laughter] harris: he s now calling to local radio. [laughter] jessica: doesn t want his message and his words twisted by people s interpretation.
don t be dishonest. the people she named have all said to reporters and to the senate judiciary committee we have no recollection of being at this, no memory of this. we don t think we were at there the. that doesn t mean it didn t happen. they have no recollection. she does. i m not saying. joan, i did not interrupt you while you were going. let me talk. that s fair, scott. i am not going to dispute her claim she s going to make under oath. it s her right. i m going to say, if you want to take it seriously, four people say no, we don t know the location, we don t know the exact year. there are questions that have to be asked about if you re going to take what she says on the record seriously, you have to take the questions raised seriously. can i ask you something. the senate judiciary committee is going to ask them all tomorrow. that s an appropriate venue. do you think they should vote the day after? i think they had to schedule the vote because of the way the rule
bottom of this, they would be subpoenaing him, asking for other witnesses. this is a farce. but i think that the other side is going to be very sorry tomorrow. scott, do you want to respond to that. i m not going to dispute the claim she s going to make under oath. it s her right and i m glad she s being heard. if we re going to take the allegations seriously, we also have to take seriously the other parts of the story. she s named four people she says were there. all four say it didn t happen. they don t say that. don t be dishonest. the people she named have all said to reporters and to the senate judiciary committee we have no recollection of being at this, no memory of this. we don t think we were at there the. that doesn t mean it didn t happen. they have no recollection. she does. i m not saying. joan, i did not interrupt you while you were going. let me talk. that s fair, scott. i am not going to dispute her claim she s going to make under oath. it s her right.
intelligence community did now. i think that should be more coordinated and is a threat. i think the timing. melissa: was at a threat when he was there before and it is a different threat now? jessica: is a different threat on two levels. we are talking a lot more about russian meddling than we were before, it doesn t mean it didn t happen before but we are certainly more actively talking about it. second of all, it s a p.r. threat for the president and the republican party more generally. i don t think going into the midterm that they need to have a potential reboot of what happened in helsinki were people on both sides of the aisle were extremely upset with how president trump behaved in public. we don t know what happened behind closed doors. i don t know why that can t wait until after the midterms especially as we ve seen rod rosenstein released their plan for how to going to combat russian meddling in the 2018 election. we heard from mike pompeo that they re coming for us aga
tucker: this is from the report. thenm report classified iginformation was compromised by individuals to include foreign governments or intelligence services via cyber intrusion, pardon me. no reference there to her server. look, she was sending emails all over the place right through the official channels. so you are laughing. you just read me. tucker: i m laughing. your position, there is nothing on there about her server.no tucker: i don t have a position. i m merely repeating what the ig report says, which is she had classified material on the server, as we except it doesn t say about her server. that s my point. tucker: if it wasn t a server, then where was it? there is nothing about her server that s in that report. tucker:t okay. so where do you think that information resided? well, maybe we could ask people. go to the ig and ask them to find out. but if it was her server i guarantee you it would have been in there. tucker: nice try. nice try.te that s w