because the abuse so horrific? it has been so horrific, i thought i should do anotherjob. but then i thought, why should i do that. i am told pretty much, if you don t like the heat, get out of the kitchen. just because people don t like an occupation it doesn t mean it isn t valid and enjoyable to others. it doesn t mean i deserve the abuse. abuse should not be tolerated in any industry and there is abuse in every job. but for some reason we are told that because we put ourselves online, we deserve it and i should quit. but i should never tell anyone else to quit theirjob just because other people cannot be nice. that else to quit theirjobjust because other people cannot be nice. that is a really good other people cannot be nice. that is a really good point. other people cannot be nice. that is a really good point. what other people cannot be nice. that is a really good point. what do - other people cannot be nice. that is a really good point. what do you - a really good point.
statement saying this pardon is not something being discussed in the white house. the president has not made a decision on pardoning paul manafort or anyone else. just because the discussion is not happening at the white house doesn t mean it isn t happening at other places, at bedminster or anywhere else. interesting to see the white house parsing its words over this issue. clearly, anderson, this is something under discussion, something been on the president s mind and appears it s been on the president s mind lately, as well. to hear the president yet again go after attorney general jeff sessions, going after him in that interview, we will talk to him more about it later. where do things stand on that? you heard him earlier on fox, what kind of man is this, once again seizing on this recusal jeff sessions decided to go with early on in the administration to stay out of the russian investigation. that has obviously been under the president s skin ever since
they had to make proffers and the lawyer says here s what we know and would say and why we want immunity. the government already probably has some of this information or some sense. not just related to michael cohen. it might have been. that s a very important point you re making, you have to show the government you have something worthwhile before they ll give you immunity. it s a big deal to give immunity to someone because you are potentially avoiding prosecution of serious crimes. the fact they gave him immunity suggests that pecker has something serious they need. the interview the president gave which aired this morning, in which he talked about, first of all, the campaign finance violations of michael cohen, they weren t really campaign finance related. said they weren t crimes. and it wasn t campaign money. and he talked about flippers as being something that should almost be outlawed. did that make any sense to you? it s hard to be shocked by
cohen investigation as well as the mueller investigation starting increasingly to bleed together. if it seems logical he walks in with a grant of blanket immunity, would the southern district attorneys ask him about other cases not related to i have to believe. > agree. they certainly would be free to do that. given the scope of the relationship between trump and pecker, it s a lot to talk about because they go back to the 80s together. the enquirer was and organ of support for trump in a really extravagant way. the ted cruz stories were another thing. remember, the government doesn t just give out immunity. you can t walk in and say i m potentially guilty of a crime, i want immunity.
extravagant way. the remember, the government doesn t just give out immunity. you can t walk in and say i m potentially guilty of a crime, i want immunity. they had to make proffers and the lawyer says here s what we know and would say and why we want immunity. the government already probably has some of this information or some sense. not just related to michael cohen. it might have been. that s a very important point you re making, you have to show the government you have something worthwhile before they ll give you immunity. it s a big deal to give immunity to someone because you are potentially avoiding prosecution of serious crimes. the fact they gave him immunity suggests that pecker has something serious they need. the interview the president gave which aired this morning, in which he talked about, first of all, the campaign finance violations of michael cohen, they weren t really campaign