criticized your case as taking a case against bill cosby because you wanted to make a political point. they didn t feel the evidence was there. how do you respond to people who say you are going to be trying a man a second time, you didn t get a conviction the first time, why do it the second time. wanted to give you a chance to respond. sure. sure. as the court indicated in this, this is a do-over. we start again and just because a verdict was not reached in one case doesn t mean it won t be reached next time around. we don t know why it wasn t reached in this, but there s no guarantees as to a result in the case. this is our system. we put it before a group of jurors and to the second part i think of your question there, this case is about a drug-facilitated sexual assault.
sure, sure, as the court indicated in this, this is a do-over. we start again and just because, you know, a verdict was not reached in one case doesn t mean it won t be reached next time around. and we don t know why it wasn t reached, but there s no guarantee as to a result in a case. this is our system and we put it before a group of jurors. and the second part i think of your question there. this case is about a drug facilitated sexual assault and it doesn t matter, you know, what you look like or who you are, you know, our job is to follow the evidence where it takes us. we have done that and we have put together evidence that we
forward. susan, his calculus is that it didn t have the votes and he wanted to have something passed. that s good tactics in terms of the senate, but isn t it surrendering to the nra? well, it s a cold calculation. what can get through the senate, the straw purchasing provision my biblt get through the senate. it s possible that university background checks, to gun shows and other venues might get through, but there was no way an assault weapons ban was going to get through this senate. not only because reps were opposed. we had half a dozen democratic senators expressing opposition or raising questions. this doesn t mean it won t come up in the senate. it can be offered as an amendment. i think that s likely to happen. i think is most certainly will go down in defeat. chris, the president says he was in favor of this. jay carney said the president was in favor of it. how much did they put on the line here? did they make calls and call
paul ryan s budget is expected to hold sway after a series of votes, but it won t be for lack of trying by the democratic minority. to talk about the contrasting policies, jim clyburn. mr. leader, thank you for being with us. thank you so much for having me. first of all, the budget fights ahead, it s clear that the house votes are all going to go the republicans way, but right now the senate is even talking about voting in favor of paul ryan s budget, even though they don t want it to pass. so what what are the competing tactics right now on the ryan budget? well, i don t know exactly what the senate s plans might be, but i do know this. the ryan budget will inflict so
that in pure meteorology terms it will not be a hurricane, it s going to be more of a nor easter, because of that the national hurricane center, it falls out of their jurisdiction, so they do not issue hurricane watches and warnings, then it goes to the local national weather service offices to issue high wind watches and warnings. and it is in a sense, a pr mistake, if you think about it, a lot of the media when people hear in and the public hears, hurricane warning coming to you, people take that much more seriously than when they hear a high wind warning. however, for purity in meteorology sense, they re not going to do it, they re going to transfer jurisdiction off to a different department within the national weather service to handle it. so, just because there are not hurricane watches or warnings that are issued across anywhere north of north carolina, that doesn t mean it won t be hurricane conditions. in fact, it will be hurricane conditions and it will be conditions like this