that necessarily means that the muslim brotherhood is brought back into a political process, but they ve now watched the 17-year-old daughter of their leader be killed by state forces in one of the bloodiest crashes. the question to you, samer, then, is what does the muslim brotherhood do next? that i think is what all eyes are upon. what is the reaction here? the muslim brotherhood faced repression in the fast. in the 1950s and 60s, the regime imprisoned many of them and detained others. many had to flee the country. they are unlikely as a group, and already declared a willingness to resort to violence. now, that doesn t mean there aren t going to be fringe elements that see no hope other than violence against the state. they re going to say that we participated in the political process. we participated in it and look what happened. as an organization, they re not going to resort to violence.
mujahedin and there s chaos. if you don t get this transition through the u.n., the ideal solution, had any type of conflict, even if you re backing the right guys, doesn t mean there aren t other guys there who will take advantage and could lead to a civil war. right? it s very iffy. david is right. to make one final point, it s not in our interest for this to end suddenly tomorrow with assad going. the opposition really isn t strong. the moderate opposition isn t strong enough. creating an iraq-like vacuum. the jihadists are the strongest fighters. three or four months from now that will not be true. that you can do a no-fly zone ea easily, i m told by u.s. officials that s just not so. you have to move the batteries that are in turkey almost to the border. they would be vulnerable. you have to be prepared to defend american soldiers lives on that border. has any war ever been easier
straight from the pit of hell. i think there is a theory. theory of evolution. and i don t accept it, you know, as a theory. just don t think we re at the point where anybody has absolute proof on either side. ron paul, a science skeptic going to bat for him. that is hardball for now and coming up next is your business with j.j. ramberg. afi: atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem, a condition that puts him at greater risk for a stroke. [ gps ] turn left. i don t think so. [ male announcer ] for years, bob took warfarin, and made a monthly trip to the clinic to get his blood tested. but not anymore. bob s doctor recommended a different option: once-a-day xarelto®. xarelto® is the first and only once-a-day prescription blood thinner for patients with afib not caused by a heart valve problem, that doesn t require routine blood monitoring. like warfarin, xarelto® is proven effective to reduce the risk of an afib-related stroke.
don t have in the previous president. you re laughing. am i wrong? you re right. am i wrong? keep going. you re doing fine. thank you for patronizing me. the fact is what e do we want? i think we want a woman as a president. i just feel it. women my age have expressed that to me in all different tones positively and negatively but they want this to happen. rick, you on this. doesn t have to do with political party. i think the country will be thrilled to nominate a woman. i think that would be fine. but hillary i think has a big problem. i think benghazi, frankly, disqualifies her. what did she do wrong? well, a lot wrong. give me it short. she left people in benghazi who had less security than our guys in paris did. there does not seem to be any direct line of command. there s no accountability. he never heard from her other than to say what difference does it make what happened? it makes a lot of difference. i think if in her campaign that would rise you believe
transition through the u.n. which is obviously the ideal solution, any time of conflict, even if you re backing the right guys, doesn t mean there aren t other guys there who will take advantage. it could lead to a civil war. right? it s very iffy. david is right. to make one final point, chris, it s, in a sense, not in our interest for this to end suddenly tomorrow with assad going, because the opposition really isn t strong the moderate opposition isn t strong enough. you re creating an iraq-like vacuum, and the jihadists are the strongest fighters. three or four months from now, that s not going to be true. on senator mccain s argument you can do a no-fly zone easily, i m told by u.s. officials that s just not so. you d have to move the patriot batteries that are in turkey almost to the border. they d be vulnerable to syrian air attack. you d have to be prepared to defend american soldiers lives on that border which requires all kinds of additional has any war ever been eas