are saying we don t see anything, that s a strong indicator that it actually didn t happen. doesn t occam s razor suggest that this entire thing is a dog chasing its tail and this the president watched cable news and tweeted or read an article and tweeted? and isn t there something i guess at one level it s like i discounted the claim from the beginning because very clearly there was a reporting on the source but there s also something about one president accusing his predecessor we essentially an illegally conspiracy that is now proving to be baseless. right. so certainly it s it seems highly unlikely or improbable at this point that these claims are, in fact, accurate. president trump himself is shifting from, oh, wiretapping or surveillance or maybe sort of incidental collection. i think at this point the most important thing is that the president o levied very serious allegations not just against the
that all indicate that those people don t have reason to believe this stuff is true. that s significant because if president trump s claims are in fact accurate, that kind of behavior or conduct would have produced lots and lots of evidence. there would have been court orders, investigatory files, communications among the interagency. and of course the actual intercepted communications themselves. so if people with access to highly classified information are saying we don t see anything, that s a strong indicator that it actually didn t happen. doesn t occam s razor suggest that this entire thing is a dog chasing its tail and this the president watched cable news and tweeted or read an article and tweeted? and isn t there something i guess at one level it s like i discounted the claim from the beginning because very clearly there was a reporting on the source but there s also something about one president accusing his predecessor we