Page 3 - Doesnt Say News Today

Template to republicans in these five states and potentially beyond telling them that this is how they should create these forged documents. the whole reason were on to any of this is because it appears that this is something that the january 6th investigation is looking into. were sort of reverse engineering one of their lines of inquiry as best we can. but as such, look at the mark meadows connection. i mean what im about to show you, this doesnt say that the effort to coordinate these forgeri...

Pelosi. so thats why in that sense, its not a surprise. it would be much more surprising if she made an announcement and said im not running for reelection. >> and she would be potentially a lame duck. so phil, what does -- what pelosi doesnt say, as dana pointed out in this announcement, is what this means for the speakership, whether shell serve a full term. how notable do you sense that is? >> i think its an intentional omission or ambiguity. i think to danas point here, the speaker is leavin...

White house chief of staff that we as americans should agree, that that the white house chief of staff and the president should be able to communicate and there may be conversations that he had with his lawyers that also should be subject to some sort of privilege. but, no, allies of the president did not indefinitely hide behind this idea of executive privilege, that the court really threw water on last night. >> they threw water on it. its interesting. again, you know, donald trump has three a...

The three fifths compromise is of course, the language once tried in the constitution, stating each enslaved person counted as three fifths of a person, for purposes of taxation and representation in congress. that is the part you probably remember from tenth grade american history. heres the part you might not have learned in school. quote, the enslaved, the three fifth clause explains, where property and people both. the logic that followed was insincere. as people, they must have some form of...

Unlawfully considers news mutilates, obliterates or destroys -- doesnt say flush down at all, epithets implied, or attempts to do so, with a ten to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, or book, paper, documentary, out of the thing, fouled or deposit it with any clerk officer of any court -- judicial officer, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned. intent is key, but theres definitely a pattern of concealment that you guys have been unearthing. thank you very much, luk...

For me rogan is out there saying, okay, i understand why you are upset. if i have a controversial guest on, i will have somebody thats more mainstream that can counter. i think thats very important that people hear that in real-time. so i thought -- i thought that was a positive thing, him saying he was going to do more research, thats always a positive thing. the only thing i will say, and i mean i dont listen to the program, i havent listened to it much, not a regular listener, i will say ther...

Was calling home, and what phones were being used. but this makes the committees investigation all the way more difficult. i >> just dont want think, just when you talk about the norms these records, it is the law to. its not just norms. the president is quite clear on this. he says whoever willfully unlawfully conceals news, mutilates obliterates or destroy its, doesnt say flush down the toilet, or intends to do so, take some carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper document, or ot...

Differences in the financial statements. that really is going to be an issue of fact, ultimately, for a jury to decide. but the reason that matters is what they are signaling is a legal argument that the defense can make, which is look, you know, you have to prove that if we said something wrong, it was material. and the accountants are on record as saying we dont think the discrepancies are material. that doesnt absolve them, but it certainly doesnt say that you then cant ask the principal, the...

York of the criminal investigations by the city of new york, and that anything that donald trump says or doesnt say, whether he takes a bit, whether he refuses to testify in this civil investigation, could prejudice the criminal investigation, therefore they want all of this to be put on hold until the criminal investigation is done. thejudge did not agree the criminal investigation is done. the judge did not agree with that, however it is fairly certain that donald this higher up the legal chai...

Amount in the settlement, often the victim feels that that is an admission from her point of view. of course, from his point of view, he will not acknowledge anything wrong. further, it interesting, that he does say that she has suffered as a victim of abuse? but what does that mean? he doesnt say abuse by whom, he doesnt say sexual abuse, he doesnt say that he had anything to doesnt say that he had anything to do with her abuse, and he doesnt say when it occurred or how or with whom it occurred...