opportunity to answer questions. and if the president doesn t want to, he ll just move on and finish the investigation without talking to him. the other possibility is that he actually really needs the president s input on these questions in order to resolve this responsibly, in which case i think at this point you will see a subpoena very quickly because clearly at this point i don t think the president s lawyers, a reasonable observer would say they were negotiating in good faith at this point. so at this point, if you are looking to that you really need the interview, you have to move forward with the subpoena. hold on, ben. if they don t interview the president, do they open themselves up to a charge from donald trump s supporters or people who are not supportive of this investigation, a charge of not really covering all of their
aid to farmers, that smells more like socialism. also you have a number of republicans who smell that as well and don t like it. it s not even an ideal form of socialist, whatever that is. because that s not going to do much to help those farmers. i think all the republicans have been quoted as saying we d rather have trade, not aid. so it may be a form of socialism. not a very effective one. i think democrats need to continue to harp on that. something else that was pointed out earlier. if mcconnell is even saying we need to postpone the wall, then he ought to think about postponing come on now, you think he s going to do that? here s the thing. i know he doesn t want to. that may end up helping us also. we may lose the battle but win the war. of course, we ve not figured out a way to stop cavanaukavanaugh evangelical voters are going
no. i m sorry, richard just called. we got served from the new york times, i told you this. regarding unseal the divorce papers with ivanna. we re fighting it. never be able to get that. no. never they don t have don t have a legitimate purpose. woman that doesn t want to correct. and it s all going on for a while. two oar thrr three weeks. delay it. no purpose for it. charleston. i need to open up a company for the trnz fansfer of that info regarding our friend david. give it to me. i ve spoken to allen wieselberg will how to set the
doesn t want to. he built his wealth, fame and platform based on unfettered free speech. once you allow unfettered spree speech you get what we re getting now. conspiracy theirories, fake new dangerous rhetoric and facebook is scrambling to fix it. there are several options facebook to choose but mark zuckerberg doesn t want to choose any of them. not compelled to do anything at this point least. see you in a little bit, jim. you ll be on morning joe in a moment, reading axios a.m. as well. go to signup.axios.com. that does it for us. morning joe starts right now. these baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence. do you accept that president obama was born in the united states no, i don t know.
call. but this is some significant resignations could be a jolt because what else is working here? so your paper, the washington post, reports, jonathan, that ahead of meeting, staffers provided the president with 100 pages of briefing materials aimed at laying out a proper posture towards putin. you could ask the question why do you provide 100 pages of briefing materials to a president who s not known to read or likes bullet points. are you trying to get plausible deniability in case the worse happens. and we know he was playing golf leading up to the summit. what do you make of that? maybe your theory is right, maybe it s plausibility denialability. maybe someone in the administration actually takes their job seriously in terms of preparing the supposed leader of the free world for a summit unlike any other when you re up against what s supposed to be the country s number one adversary. but, again, when you have a pupil who doesn t want to who