joe biden. rachel: yeah. such a great point. steven, there was another article that was putting forward another name. i actually found this one to be even more bizarre. the idea in this article was that the only way for the democrats to win and guarantee that donald trump doesn t win is to have a split ticket and the choice there was joe biden with vice president liz cheney. what do you make of that? except it wouldn t be a split ticket. it would be two democrats on a ticket. in that sense it would be what we always have. i want to underscore that donald trump is loved by his party. joe biden, he can t even get democrats to show up for his speech on eliminating voter i.d. and eliminating election security. this is a top priority of the democrat party. get rid of voter i.d. get rid of election security. mail in your ballots and stacy abrams ditches his speech. that is how toxic he has become inside of his own party. so, they are a party in crisis. and here s my new slash for
in which he doesn t win is bound to be fraudulent, that undermines faith in the very process elections. 0k, just a couple if i may, because we re running short of time, just a couple of really important questions on the supreme court. first one you appear to be saying that, yeah, the politicisation of the court has happened under republican presidents who have appointed justices whom, you know, you feel were not appointed in the right way. your response, and you just sat on a commission appointed byjoe biden to look at the future of the court, which said that it wasn t keen on dramatic actions, but your personal response seems to be that you want the court re engineered by creating, i guess, at least four new justices to ensure that the current conservative majority is overturned. how on earth could that restore any notion of independence and credibility to the court? it would do quite the reverse.
no right to be there? i m not saying they have no right to be there. you are putting words in my mouth. i m saying that the court, as an institution, does not deserve the confidence that it once did, and i do not think that by pretending that the emperor is beautifully clothed, that we can solve the problem. i m not saying that people should cast no aspersions on any american institutions. i m saying that the attempt to say that, as donald trump did, that any election outcome in which he doesn t win is bound to be fraudulent, that undermines faith in the very process elections. 0k, just a couple if i may, because we re running short of time, just a couple of really important questions on the supreme court. first one you appear to be saying that, yeah, the politicisation of the court has happened under republican presidents who have appointed justices whom, you know, you feel were not appointed in the right way.