welcome to hannity . we begin with a fox news alert. the united states and united kingdom conducted precision error strikes against the houthi rebels. now after months of serious terror attacks to critical shipping channels in the red sea and irani and missiles fired into israel, the biden administration has finally responded. will it be enough to deter future attacks? by the way, what about iran? a sickly the backbone of the houthis. they offer supplies and train. they direct the houthi rebels. they are fighting every proxy war they are involved in. any consequences at all for them? an important reminder tonight. in one of his first acts as president joe biden remove the houthis from the designate terror list act and is very naïve and foolish attempt to appease iran is now another major blunder for the administration. why joe biden has this obsession to suck up to iran, only god knows. my monologue coming up. but first with the latest from the white house tonight our very
then it comes to the implication of his own son on his own laptop and communications about monies going to his father. at that point are we talking about what are we talking about if a vice president leverage leverage is a billion dollars to get a prosecutor fired after five days of having a phone call with burisma executives and his son gets paid millions for doing nothing with no experience at a time that he s a drug addicts. what do you call that? they call it bribery. what you just described, sean, is the facts that took place when joe biden went to ukraine and conditioned the release of american tax dollars eight to ukraine on the firing of the prosecutor who was applying pressure to burisma. all of that is corroborated by the confidential human source. they told the fbi that the head of burisma said we hired hunter biden to protect us through his dad. that s the prosecutor who they got fired, the conditional
when you say they should be able to ask about things that happened eight or ten years ago, this is a billionaire. he s made hundreds of thousands of transactions and thousands of pages and the problem becomes a witch hunt at that point. no, it doesn t. this is core to the investigation. well, if they are looking at all of his if the russians gave him billions of dollars eight or ten years ago and he s still beholden to that. his organization, it was not an organization of hundreds of thousands. he s not running at&t. right. it s a pretty big operation. really? it s complex but it s not big. it s not a big operation. and if you limit it to the foreign dealings, because that s what we re talking about, it shouldn t be that difficult. one of the arguments is that it was not in russia itself. through deutsch bank and toronto and big rock capital. all those things. that should be on the table