Obligation to account fully for my role in these events. Did by obligation, you mean simply your legal obligation . Or did you mean something bigger . Well, both my legal obligation and my moral obligation. Your moral obligation . I actually want to present an alternative theory. Your family came here escaping the holocaust via uruguay. And your parents moved lucy and later you here where, frankly, youve been an american success story. Through dent of hard work and innovation, good idea, and knack to hire the right people and some luck, youve built a considerable successful business. One that i know for a fact would make your parents proud. They came here because they knew
that it was here that they could have freedom that they had not enjoyed, security that they had not enjoyed, and opportunity that they had not enjoyed. And no doubt, on some level, youre grateful and its created a sense of patriotism in you. Is that fair to say . Very fair. Why then, sir, with your courage to come be
Faculty were against a no-confidence vote in Provost Bill Hardgrave, but their meeting was marred by confusion as the Faculty Senate Executive Committee attempted to explain the voting procedure.
happening at the moment. however, there seemsompp to be tension between mick mulvaney and the white house counsel on this. s well, when you it s when you when you read an article like this when- a competitor gets it, you always try to reverse engineer and try to figure out where some of the sourcing might be coming from. and talkingso to some people th are close to this, there s a suggestion, not proof but a suggestion, that it, may be coming from this this attack on mulvaney or this not attack n is too strong but this article about mulvaney is coming out of the white house counsel s office.ou we don t know that for certain. but i think what we do know is that white house has been very sensitive toee any reports of friction between the two. we also know heading into this next phase of the h impeachment inquiry, right, we ve got that dear colleague letter out on the house of representatives. it s clear schiff is moving forward. it could comeov as soon as next week after thei
or irregular channel of diplomacy is quote/unquote absolutely false. isn t that right? that s correct. the presumption that military aid was conditioned on investigations was based on mulvaney s statement that we saw on the video, isn t that right? well, i didn t have the benefit at that time of mulvaney s statement. but you would stand by the presumption that you had based on what you know now, right? correct. and on september 1, when you told andriy yermak your presumption, which you ve told us about military aid being conditioned on the investigations, you then told mr. morrison what you told yermak. and morrison did not try to dispute your presumption, correct? i don t recall him disputing it. i think i went right over to him and and just repeated the conversation. and when you told vice president pence your concerns, he did not dispute that, as well? he didn t respond. he just listened.
could drag out past the house democrats time frame for impeachment. that s in one corner. on the other, it could be mulvaney sending a signal he is separating out from the president something that his lawyer emphatically denied but at the end of the day i was told a couple weeks ago mulvaney didn t see a reason to have his own attorney and now he does. that is coming at a time when you see republicans increasingly focus on mulvaney and a couple other aides as the possible people to offload responsibility for what happened with ukraine on. we ll see. that one is interesting. that latter scenario of mick mulvaney separating himself from the president. he also brought a lot on himself when he did that press briefing where he laid out essentially the circumstances here, said yes, actually the fact that the president did want this investigation into this debunked conspiracy theory ukraine was behind interference in the 2016 election, that s why investigators and republicans and democra