far-fetched charges surrounding a legal nondisclosure agreement signed six years ago. according to the media mob, we re watching the crime of the century. today it was o.j. simpson and the white bronco. it was john gotti being brought to justice. nobody is above the law. less than 24 hours, donald trump will be the first former president in history to be charged with a crime but for what? allegations of a mislabelled document? a $130,000 nondisclosure agreement? a case that relies almost in total on the testimony from a convicted admitted liar? a felon by the name of michael cohen? a case that has never been tried before using a new legal theory that was never applied to anyone else? and a cause that looks to be well-past the statute of limitations. the charges are so weak, the bob mueller, the prior manhattan district attorney declined to bring a case. former congressman that voted to impeach donald trump, this is what he tweeted. we re going to indict a former president for
criminalizing political differences all while attempting to hurt donald trump s reputation and derail his 2024 election campaign. the u.s. has entered a new age of political retribution. if you re hunter biden, let s see. there s evidence on your laptop of you smoking crack or hiring prostitutes or laundering money or maybe skirting on taxes. or lying on a gun application. in a republican state, does that mean you can thank alvin brag if you get charged with a crime? if you re from the biden family or clinton family, thank alvin bragg if you re arrested. when joe leaves office, the big guy, he s likely going to want to hire good lawyers himself. because this new era of political justice, if you want to call it that, will not begin and end at the criminal court in manhattan as tom fenton stated. you can be sure there s prosecutors across florida and
himself try this case. it s ludicrous on its face. you know, i think it will face motions to dismiss not just on the statute ute of limitations but the argument that the law doesn t support this kind of a charge. the alleged fact s don t suppor a crime. i d like to see an honest judge, objective and neutral, look at the motions to dismiss seriously and sincerely. i slightly disagree with the professor. do think they most judges do not want to be and fearful of being overturned by a higher court. i hope that gives this particular judge pause when he considers the motions to dismiss. jesse: sean: same question, professor. in this case, a judge would rather be reveersed on appeal than have to come home and look his wife and family in the eye and say i let trump out. also, the appellate court judges
store in a changing room that donald trump allegedly attacked a woman. that s the next thing on the table. following that is the georgia case. i read the transcript multiple times. i don t see anything that looks like a crime in any way, shape, manner or form and fulton county georgia is probably as liberal as new york city. yeah,justice robert jackson basically said and i ll paraphrase him here, we could find a violation of the law of a technicality of any person in the united states. which is why we don t find the man and then the crime. we find the crime and then the man that committed the crime. it s the opposite. it s inverted in this case. i think everyone in this country can recognize the miscarriage of justice. when you have jeb bush and ron desantis and donald trump and billion barr and the list goes on and on on the same page on this, that should tell you
attempt to take down father-in-law again. it goes to show you how afraid that are of donald trump. when you have to go so far to make up a crime and piece it together with scotch tape to bring town donald trump. they ve been trying to do this for years, almost seven years now to take him down. it s rather amazing. yeah, it s a little surreal to think this is where we are right now in the united states of america. i think it s frightened a lot of people. it s awakened a lot of people. as of 72 hours post indictment, the trump campaign raised $7 million. that is an incredible statistic. as i said a quarter of the donations were first time trump supporters. they had never donated to trump before. it s amazing to see the support from people out there, even with sarah carter s interviews.