first of all, rusata, which is the russian anti-doping agency, if you can really call it anti-. they have no credibility in this. everybody knows dating back to the days of the soviet union, the soviet union and now russia have run a sophisticated state operated doping program. in fact, they did it right under the noses of the ioc when they hosted the winter olympics in sochi, changing out urine samples right there while they were hosting the games. and they ll do it again in some form or fashion because that s just what they do. on the other hand, them saying this tribunal saying that she had no fault or negligence on her own probably makes sense. because, unfortunately, 15 years old she s just at the mercy of this sports machine. she may well not have known what was being administered to her, and even if she did she had no
russian anti-doping agency, if you can really call it anti-they have no credibility in this, everybody knows dating back to the days of the soviet union, the soviet union and now russia have run a sophisticated state operated doping program. in fact, they did it right under the noses of the ioc when they hosted the games, changing it out right there and they will do it again in some form or fashion, that s what they do, on the other hand, them saying this tribunal saying that vieva had no fault or negligence of her own, probably makes some kind of sense because unfortunately, 15 years old, she s just at the mercy of the sports machine, she may well not have known what was being administered to her and even if she did, she had in choice to say no, i m not going to do this. this is a brutal system.
In a statement on T.J. Dillashaw’s removal from USADA’s pool, the drug-testing agency referenced an extra condition for fighters looking to return to active competition.