Page 448 - Dots News Today

Interference in a political, for a political gain, political gains, is inappropriate behavior, and so i think that as people learn more about this, understand that now i think were on our fifth witness who has corroborating the underlying details of this call, and what appears to be a month-long effort to get the ukrainian government to investigate a son of a political rival. you know, this -- this is very, very disturbing behavior. >> on the call the 25th, july 25th call transcript, originally ...

President zelensky, it says right at the bottom of page 1, this is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. its called a memorandum of a telephone conversation. and if you go through it on several points, there are ellipses. biden went pander bragging that he stopped the prosecution, so if you can look into it -- dot, dot, dot -- it sounds horrible to me. so we dont know whats in the dot, dot, dot. another point, i would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with ukraine...

Ellipses, those little three dots that says something is missing suggests three excerpts were either removed or simply left out. "the new york times" reports that vindmans edits would have filled in one of those blanks. quote, where the third set of ellipses appears and while vindman says he doesnt know why some of his edits were rejected, it row counts how the call was handled. it was locked down on a secure server that serves this countrys highly classified state secrets. they squirreled it aw...

Officer whose works is detailed in the white house and overheard the presidents phone call to ukraine. the "times" writes quote he told house impeachment investigators on tuesday that the white house transcript of a july call between president trump and ukraines president omitted crucial words and phrases. and that his the teams restore them failed. the omissions included there were recordings of former vice president biden discussing ukraine corruption and an explicit mention by ukraines presid...

In some of the places where we see an ellipses, three dots in the text, the lieutenant colonel says there, thats where the president was saying things that the lieutenant colonel tried later to put back into the record but was rebuffed according to his apparent testimony today. this lieutenant colonel is the first impeachment witness who actually listened to that july 25 phone call between trump and his ukrainian counterpart that is at the center of this impeachment inquiry. nbc news has also co...

Inside the white house, and overheard the presidents phone call to ukraine. the "times" writes, quote, that he told house impeachment investigators on tuesday that the white house transcript of a july call between president trump and ukraines president omitted crucial words and phrases, and that his attempts to restore them failed. the omissions included mr. trumps assertion that there were recordings of former vice president biden discussing ukraine corruption and an explicit mention by ukraine...

Officials saying they had problems with the meeting. now fiona hill, bill taylor related to what he was told here, hello! starts with -hi!mple... how can i help? about the july 10th meeting, and colonel vindman all say the same a data plan for everyone. everyone? everyone. lets send to everyone! [ camera clicking ] thing, that sondland says has a different recollection wifi up there? -ahhh. eye on as weeunant colonel vind sure, why not? howd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was ea...

The dot, dot, dots, as you referenced, its a gross abuse of power. and if all president trump did was ask the ukrainian president to help him investigate the bidens, that would be a gross abuse of power. but he didnt just do that, he leveraged a white house meeting and also leveraged $391 million of your taxpayer dollars. that is what were investigating and i very much look forward to hearing from the lieutenant colonel tomorrow. >> there seems to be a conflict in colonel vindmans testimony and ...

>> of course, lawrence. that will be a part of our investigation as well as understanding who else was on the call. did anyone else express concern. but lawrence, frankly, if there was nothing else, you know, to the dot, dot, dots, as you referenced, its a gross abuse of power. and if all president trump did was ask the ukrainian president to help him investigate the bidens, that would be a gross abuse of power. but he didnt just do that, he leveraged a white house meeting and he didnt just do t...

Whether questioning whether it happened at all. >> because russia wants to keep trump on a string. this isnt just true about yesterday. whenever trump praises russia, they will stay back and say were not sure about this policy. because it has the affect of make iing them try harder to apl to moscow. secondly, wants to keep talking in syria. but not just during the administration. russia has taken the initiative. not only in defending the assad regime. of but in taking advantage of the political ...