Page 7 - Draft Committee News Today

Actually happened in 1999 in ammiano for mayor. I recall some of that, but try not to recall all of it this sec. You could have the same efforts that happened with run he had run, and progress for all, in the context of a writein campaign and im not sure under this definition it would get captured. That is why im hung up on qualification versus election. May i ask you a question about that . Sure. Its not clear to me why that is materially different from what we have . Well, again its not necess...

There was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding of task force for the commission in the event that the commission doesnt overturn the tank ask force. I think the task force and the commission stand separately and i would not subject that you take the Task Force Recommendation on its own. You can choose to, but i dont think there should be a regthat provides in the absence of a Commission Decision to the contrary. I think there are really different powers and duties and i wouldnt wa...

1 . Public comment . David pillpa. Im trying to kind of work through this language, including the top of page 2, lines 14. Sorry, its giving me a headache. I would suggest a few points. On line 17 and 18, i would reword it slightly to say, in order to support the qualification of an identifiable person for city Elective Office. Because that presumes that that person has not yet qualified, and that the purpose of the endeavor is to have them be a qualified candidate. Its not to support the electi...

Sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden, if they didnt meet their burden, then you go the other way. Although it does play out in the same ways that we have talked about. I also would not substitute there was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding o...

Pasture, and get things done. [applause] the next question comes from nick, managing editor of the hays daily news. It will be addressed to mr. Orman first. The winner of this election will likely play a significant role in the development of the next farm bill. Tot do you see as necessary feed a growing and hungry world . First and foremost, the farmers i have talked to around this date the state say it is the Crop Insurance policy be they need to be able to plant their crops with certainty. We...

Real clear politics average of recent polling has mr. Davis with the lead. Im paul davis who likes Proven Solutions. Jerry special driver demonstrate the direction governor brownback has been taking our state. Can you tell us to education, low job growth and downgrades in one year and now he says he is going to hit the accelerator on his agenda. Kansas governors race. Before i introduce the introduce, i want to the people who are going to be asking questions here today. Our media panel, and they...

Task force previously constituted, the consensus and a very strong consensus of the task force has been were not sending matters to you for readjudication. Were sending them for enforcement of our orders of determination. I agree. The point of this was to provide some deference to the task force decision and i for one am comfortable with the possibility on a 22 vote a task force find would be upheld, if the commission felt that the [tphaebz ] were [prerpbt ] felt that was propriety. If they felt...

Were all operating in good faith in this room, but there are others outside of this room that may not be or may or may not be watch this. What was the language . I think it makes it more parallel to no. 1 [ 2 ]. Instead of the word qualification, i would use candidacy. Im not sure if candidacy encompasses writein or not . I dont like terminating the end of that sentence. Presumably someone who has qualified that is the point i wanted to make more globally. The problem is the state law definition...

Mr. Chatfield. Hopefully i will make it easier. Cause of hearing was developed because because there was a concern had a something coming from the task force, they have already made a decision. So the commission wanted to ensure that that commission or that decision was sort of coming in. The presumption is a violation has occurred when had he come here. So the respondent has to show why the task force was incorrect in making that decision for you to move on the showcause part, not chapter 3. So...

That is just how things go. This whole issue came up because of a loophole, because someone found a leap hole. Right. So i think to some extent the Ethics Commission has the ability to address leap hole lope holes. The only downside if we dont define support at all there will be the chance of zero gay and lesbian as of what support means. If we had support i would define it as public action or statement or actions encouraging or urging i will concede that im hoping that my hypothetic is ridiculo...