Page 35 - Dragging News Today

Correct. house speaker is blamed not waiting for the judicial process to play through to force witnesses such as mulvaney and bolton to appear before the house before the articles of impeachment were written up and passed on to the senate. the speaker is demanding witnesses be brought before the gnat. remember that the white house said, they cant testify. the house speaker kind of missed an opportunity by letting the courts decide this. what she was concerned about was the delay. she didnt want ...

Wa. >> and what we saw yesterday, gross and ugly, they dont even believe everything theyre saying. they were playing to an audience. that audience is donald trump. donald trump tweeted or retweeted what it? 125 for a reason. a way telling republicans, im watching. im engaged. i care. dont you dare do anything less than a full defense of me. >> so what happens on the senate side? you have the mcconnell and talk about decorum in the senate how they want it to be quick. powerful. you know? and then...

Swalwell did an excellent job of summarizing the case there just as he did in the questioning in yesterdays hearing where he asked the counsel for the democrats, in sasimilar way he asked a series of questions all of which elicited the same answer. who was it, who hired giuliani to smear joe biden? president trump. who was it that withheld the white house meeting? president trump. and so focusing this was not a rogue rudy giuliani. this was not underlings at the state department. this was presid...

Of which elicited the same answer. who was it, who hired giuliani to smear joe biden? president trump. who was it who withheld the aid and the white house meeting? president trump. and so focusing this was not a rogue rudy giuliani. this was not underlings at the state department. this was president trump utilizing his office to put his own personal political interests ahead of the interests of the country. and i think when you frame it that way, it really makes the question of impeachment a ver...

Yesterday advanced the debunked theory that ukraine meddled in the 2016 election. thats despite a briefing by u.s. intelligence officials warning the narrative is being promoted by russian security services. >> do you believe ukraine meddled in the america election in 2016? >> i do, and i think theres considerable evidence -- >> you do? you do? >> yes, and chuck, let me say -- >> senator, this sort of strikes me as odd because you went through a primary campaign with this president. he launched ...

Happen? the average person at home might feel like this is dragging. it is not dragging. the clinton impeachment in the senate alone took five weeks. >> this is really, really moving quickly andll the president was saying i want to be impeached fast, but the caveat is the democrats have already been doing that. democrats have the very beginning when nancy pelosi a few weeks ago announced an impeachment inquiry saying they were going to move expeditiously and they have done that. i iomean, that m...

Heather: abu bakr al-baghdadi was killed during a special forces raid in october. he did not say what intel was found or if any of it will be released. a manhunt intensifying, accused of dragging police officers 50 yards with a stolen car. the incident in dayton, ohio, may have been premeditated. >> all this violence is just ridiculous. >> reporter: one officer is injured but is expected to be okay. suspects nearly ran over two other officers with another stolen car. and the four teenagers, from...

Policies. the bad news for warren is that medicare for all is not popular. in the q poll, its dropping. theres a great story in the "times" showing that people up and down the democratic party from president obama down to people working in labor are saying, look, this is a bad thing for us. were not happy about it. were worried about where it will take the country in our own health care, and i think the real thing happening here is its not that popular of a policy, and its dragging down the cand...

Saying this evening, john, that his client will not be participating, will not be testifying no matter what this ruling says. and so the white house is back to the trump administration, is back to where theyve been in all of this, which is a position of stonewalling. >> it is interesting. don mcgahns attorney specifically said that if it not stayed, he will testify. thats very specific language, and well talk about why thats significant because he could have said something else. well get to that...

This which is the position of stonewalling. >> it is interesting. don mcgahns attorney specifically said if it is not stayed, he will testify. very specific language and well talk about that. well get to it. what does this mean in the list of other white house officials who have tea identified subpoenas? >> i talked to a legal source who said listen, this absolutely applies to nick mulvaney and john bolton and it has been played throughout all this. you know this all too well. the white house ha...