We are in a debate between the two men seeking to britains next Prime Minister. Good evening. In two weeks time, either Boris Johnson or jeremy will become our new Prime Minister. Tonight they debate each other facetoface responding to questions from our viewers from across the u. K. And you can take debate. Ing the itv each candidate will brelf set out why they will be the best Prime Minister. Boris johnson, your opening statement. Mr. Johnson this country faces a momentous choice. We can either continue with the same old failed approach, destroying trust in politics, sapping Business Confidence or else we can change, get back our mojo and restore this countrys republic pietation around the world and put us on a longterm path of success. And we need to unite our country more police on the beat, full Fiber Broadband for all and make our case to the people again. With renewed power and conviction. To have fantastic infrastructure and public services, you must have a Dynamic Market econo
At the News Conference today steve. Thanks very much, melissa the Federal Reserve left Interest Rates unchanged at the june meeting but made a major change in the outlook, suggesting maybe a cut ahead, maybe in the next months meeting in july. Effectively ended the policy of patience as it was born, actually signalled where it wouldnt do anything for several months, instead it is now emphasizing uncertainties in the Economic Outlook and, quote, it would act as appropriate in economic expansion. Remember back in march no federal official forecast a rate cut in 2019. Now eight are on board with rate cuts, at least one this year, and seven of those forecast two cuts, and the fed chair saying even though they arent forecasting cuts, well, theyre leaning that way. The number of those that wrote down a flat race pass agree that the case for additional accommodation has strengthened since our may meeting. Uncertainty surrounding the baseline outlook have clearly risen since our last meeting i
Totaling nearly half a billion dollars. If a court does not intervene the new york a. G. James can start going after his properties as early as next week. Wouldnt that be a sight. Good morning, everybody. Here we roll on tuesday. Bill hemmer, good morning to you. Dana im dana perino and this is americas newsroom. She might show up herself to do it, right . Since she was in the courtroom every day. Here i am with the padlock and camera. Former President Trump is asking an Appeals Court to delay or reduce the payment as he fights a civil judgment for business fraud. Leticia james says she wont hesitate to start snatching his assets. According to Jonathan Turley the law is on the former president s side. They could appeal this all the way to the Supreme Court. On occasion, the Supreme Court has intervened in state actions. On punitive damages. This is falling into that extreme category in my view. I find it appalling. It shocks the conscious that you have to pony up this type of money jus
Wealth news. Dont think its great to happy with us. Now listening countries inciting the ukraine conflict time the benefiting from the human tragedy. Thats by the way, a persons message to the 11th must go conference on interNational Security. His law of what the russian president had to say. Harassment to the computer and hold bits of long standing conflicts are being inflated in different regions of the world. And you, once ive been provoked, the goal of those who do this is obvious to continue to benefit from human tragedies to pick nations against each other. For the policy of adding fuel to the fire leads to is clearly seen in the example of ukraine, pumping billions of dollars into the neo nazi or regime supplying it with the equipment, weapons, ammunition, sending its military advisors and mercenaries does everything to further inflamed the conflict to draw their states into it, the russian and Chinese Defense ministers were among the officials addressing the conference i spoke
Cooperate to proceed as if i wasnt here for the first argument so let me focus on whats different about texas. One thing thats different abtexas is its definition of social media platforms excludes website. We can put the gmail issue to one side when talk about texas. It also excludes websites primarily focused on news, sports and entertainment. In the First Amendment business we call that contentbased discrimination. Thats one of the reasons this statute is unconstitutional. The other thing thats different is that in some respects this statute operates more simply because it forebids my clines from engaging in viewpoint discrimination. Were used to thinking that viewpoint discrimination is a bad thing and the government shouldnt do it. And of course when governments do it it is a bad thing. When editors of speakers engage in viewpoint discrimination that is their First Amendment right. It is also absolutely vital to the operation of these websites because if you have to be viewpoint n