Thouctiontionv that im cosponsoring a measure today along with mayor lee and along with supervisors yee, breed, farrell, chiu, wiener and martha would require a comprehensive facade inspection, maintenance and repair of certain buildings that are five stories or more to reduce the risk of death and or injury that may result from deterioration on exterior facades of buildings. Deteriorating facades can pose significant threats to Pedestrian Safety and this is an issue that was highlighted following the recent earthquake that impacted much of napa. Not only does this measure aim to reduce Pedestrian Safety hazards before following an earthquake, it also serves to reduce post earthquake facade debris blocking First Responders priority access routes. So, with that i hope to get the full support of the board on this measure. And the next two i have two in memoriams. It was incredibly sad last week that actually there were two district 4 residents that unfortunately passed away due to accide
~ 118 fremont street. Colleagues, lets first take item 33 so we can sit as a committee of the whole. We have a motion in front of us. Is there a motion whether we ought to sit as a committee of the whole to consider this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] on that motion, madam clerk will you call the roll . He supervisor cohen on item 33, cohen aye. Supervisor farrell . Farrell aye. Supervisor kim . Aye. Kim aye. Supervisor mar . Mar aye. Supervisor tang . Tang aye. Supervisor wiener . Wiener aye. Supervisor yee . Yee aye. Supervisor avalos . Avalos aye. Supervisor breed . Breed aye. Supervisor campos . Campos aye. Supervisor chiu . Chiu aye. There are 11 ayes. The motion is approved. [gavel] and with regard to the hearing itself, item 24, lets open up this hearing. Let me first ask supervisor kim if you have any opening comments. Thank you, president chiu. Colleagues, before us today is a modification to the transbay Redevelopment Area plan that would permit the out
With you, supervisor, that youre potentially interested in hearing from both parties as to in writing as to how the board should decide this matter in the context of the subdivision map act and our local subdivision code. So, perhaps if the board continues to december 16th you would request that the parties submit something in writing before that date. Okay, great. So, with that in mind, with the understanding that the parties would submit something in writing to this board, i would move to continue the discussion and move this item to december is not this item to december 16th. So, supervisor campos has made a motion to keep this hearing open to continue this item to december 16th and request that the parties, any briefing materials the party would like to submit, second by supervisor mar. Colleagues, any objection to the motion . Without objection that motion passes. [gavel] ~ lets now go to our second item. Madam clerk, can you call 24 through 26 . [speaker not understood] pending a
Association fees versus those that are paying market rate. What we discovered, though, in that investigation is that via state law we are prohibited from making any local ordinances that would require a subsidized or lower hoa fee. What is also exciting about this negotiation at the end of the day is that our office has been working with the Mayors Office of housing and the Mayors Office to explore tiered inlieu fees. This negotiation absolutely sets a precedent for that type of policy. We know that a waterfront condo should not be paying the same offsite fee that perhaps an 18unit residential building in the excelsior should pay. This sets a policy preference for understanding that we should look at the value of the condos that we are building and when we do offsite fees versus just letting everyone pay the same fee in and of itself. So, again, i want to emphasize that this negotiation will allow us to build 69 more Affordable Housing units, a net increase of 50 new Affordable Housing
Approval and conditionally approved the Development Agreement with the project sponsor. I also want to point out that in the Development Agreement the project sponsor has agreed to support the Community Facilities district and to vote in favor of it and even to pay a tax in lieu of the fee if the fee is not formed at the time of tco and this project sponsor has, in fact, been supportive of the csd from the very beginning. So, in the interest of time ill conclude. I am available for questions as well as kevin guy and tiffany boeing aloe, the executive director of ocii. ~ colleagues, any questions to city staff . ~ bogey okay, seeing none, unless there are any other presentations from city staff, why dont we open it up to Public Comment. Any members of the public wish to comment on this item . You know, dell see more. Ive been kind of following this project and im not necessarily a big fan of putting the relocating those units in this neighborhood because the problem is if you have a ver