Page 6 - Editing Process News Today

Professor. we are watching the results. thank you both. we will keep you posted as the results come in, and as warranted. and iran has details become available. first, brand-new details with the shameful conduct at "the new york times," the so-called paper of record. now, when the paper thought it would be a good idea to revive the unverified, uncorroborated sexual assault accusations against brett kavanaugh, two "times" reporters publishing a single source story from a third party claiming he w...

Talking about it publicly. so we cant get into that. >> the controversy for the sunday, the sunday excerpt in the sunday "new york times," part of it was that in that essay you didnt disclose that the woman that you didnt talk to the woman and that the woman herself or her friends say she doesnt remember it and those seem like vital tidbits. >> all we can talk about here is are in our book we do have that. it was in the original version and in the editing process there was debate about naming he...

Original article. steve: the "new york times." ainsley: they were interviewed over the weekend and robin is one of those writers. she said they included a lot of this information in the original article. she said the females name. her friends said she had no recollection of the event and she declined to be interviewed. that was all in the original. they have say the editors took some of that information out. steve: of the "new york times" story. ainsley: thats right. listen to. this we had her n...

Editors in the editing process in which it was sticking out. >> it almost reminds me of kids, i didnt do it she did it. and quite frankly theres more than one person responsible here. you have the writers committee of the editors. >> but the allocation itself was made by a man, who said he made this allegation but a woman and the woman herself the claim to be interviewed and said she didnt remember the incident. so how that ends up in a book and how that ends up being omitted from this op-ed. it...

Heres nadler, who campaigned to be chairman on the whole basis that he be best for impeachment the day after the election. >> what jerry another is doing today come in officially opening the first impeachment inquiry of the president holding hearings in the house judiciary committee. >> sandra: brett jacobs thank you. meanwhile the writers from that "new york times" piece now blaming editors for turning up those crucial details about the alleged victim. >> in your draft of the article did it inc...

They destroyed her virtue and ruined her reputation. >> unnamed sources saying that brett kavanaugh exposed himself at a party. what was left out is the alleged victim saying that she does not remember such incident. editors cut that crucial information from their piece. >> there was zero intent to mislead anybody. >> somewhere in the editing process, those words -- >> it was editing done in a haste of the editing process of coming you know -- >> she admits that she wrote it. still, such 2020 ca...

Removed the other reference to the fact that she didnt remember. it was sort of editing done in a haste. >> greg: so this humongous detail disappeared in the haste of the editing process. thats like saying that we left out the fact that the titanic sank. this was no error. this was a business decision. when the victim renounced her own victimhood, they renounced it. they suggested substance abuse. how do they still have jobs? and what about her allies who threatened to sue one witness? she didnt...

Coauthor. >> all we can talk about here is that in our book we do have that. it was in the original version. in the editing process i think there was some debate about naming her. in the course of that reporting, i think the judgment was made to omit her name, and that sentence also included the fact that she didnt remember it. >> melissa: so they are blaming an editor. that an editor took it out. but they went on to say that the real meat of the book -- thats not of an early point. the point is...

Times" wrote this article based on that book. robin and then kate kelly. here is robin speaking about what was taken out of her original article, she says. listen. >> we had her name. and, you know, the "times" doesnt usually include the name of the victim. >> right. >> so i think in this case the editors felt like maybe it was better to remove it. in removing her name they removed the other reference tout fact that she didnt remember. i think it was an editing done in the haste in the editing p...

But the problem for democrats here is the victim says look, i dont remember it happened. this is not the victim saying it happened and to me, having my masters in broadcast journalism, it actually slowly make my skin crawl that "the new york times" or any other outlet that calls themselves a journalist would not have all the facts that it would go by the editor before it put it out there. >> now are they blaming the editing process for leaving out the key fact. >> anybody who knows how the proce...